Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 649

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 239 of the 239 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription‐3, Inflammation, and Cancer: How Intimate Is the Relationship?

Open access
Aggarwal, Bharat B., Kunnumakkara, Ajaikumar B., Harikumar, Kuzhuvelil B., Gupta, Shan R., Tharakan, Sheeja T., Koca, Cemile, Dey, Sanjit, Sung, Bokyung·2009·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Signal transducer and activator of transcription‐3 (STAT‐3) is one of six members of a family of transcription factors. It was discovered almost 15 years ago as an acute‐phase response factor. This factor has now been associated with inflammation, cellular transformation, survival, proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis of cancer. Various types of carcinogens, radiation, viruses, growth factors, oncogenes, and inflammatory cytokines have been found to activate STAT‐3. STAT‐3 is constitutively active in most tumor cells but not in normal cells. Phosphorylation of STAT‐3 at tyrosine 705 leads to its dimerization, nuclear translocation, DNA binding, and gene transcription. The phosphorylation of STAT‐3 at serine 727 may regulate its activity negatively or positively. STAT‐3 regulates the expression of genes that mediate survival (survivin, bcl‐xl, mcl‐1, cellular FLICE‐like inhibitory protein), proliferation (c‐fos, c‐myc, cyclin D1), invasion (matrix metalloproteinase‐2), and angiogenesis (vascular endothelial growth factor). STAT‐3 activation has also been associated with both chemoresistance and radioresistance. STAT‐3 mediates these effects through its collaboration with various other transcription factors, including nuclear factor‐κB, hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1, and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor‐γ. Because of its critical role in tumorigenesis, inhibitors of this factor's activation are being sought for both prevention and therapy of cancer. This has led to identification of small peptides, oligonucleotides, and small molecules as potential STAT‐3 inhibitors. Several of these small molecules are chemopreventive agents derived from plants. This review discusses the intimate relationship between STAT‐3, inflammation, and cancer in more detail.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04911.x

Cites

239 of 239 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Show all 239 references

Cited by

See all 649

Metadata

Authors
Aggarwal, B. B., Kunnumakkara, A. B., Harikumar, K. B., Gupta, S. R., Tharakan, S. T., Koca, C., Dey, S., & Sung, B.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-08
Volume
1171
Issue
1
Pages
59-76
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2003681585
Cited by
649
References
239
FWCI
19.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription‐3, Inflammation, and Cancer: How Intimate Is the Relationship? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04911.x
The paper
Aggarwal, B. B., Kunnumakkara, A. B., Harikumar, K. B., Gupta, S. R., Tharakan, S. T., Koca, C., Dey, S., & Sung, B. (2009). Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription‐3, Inflammation, and Cancer: How Intimate Is the Relationship? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04911.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.