Cited by 23Science Education and PedagogyPsychology of Development and EducationTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Fostering Conceptual Change About Child Development in Prospective Teachers and Other College Students

Open access
McDevitt, Teresa M, Ormrod, Jeanne E·2008·Child Development Perspectives

Abstract

Research findings about children and their developmental pathways have innumerable implications for teachers, other practitioners, and parents, who often learn about child development as part of college instruction. It appears, however, that courses in child development do not always have optimal effects on college students’ understandings of children. This article identifies several factors that may impede effective learning in child development courses. Then, drawing from research in numerous content domains and with diverse student populations, it offers several hypotheses for facilitating conceptual change in college students’ understandings of child development and for promoting positive transfer of those understandings to actual practices with children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00045.x

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although previous scholars had noted difficulties posed by false beliefs students bring into the classroom, very little prior research clearly demonstrates their relationship to learning.

    “Although previous scholars had noted the difficulties posed by false beliefs that students bring into the classroom (e.g., Bloom & Weisberg, 2007;McDevitt & Ormrod, 2008), very little prior research clearly demonstrates its relationship to learning.”
  • College students in child development classes come in with incorrect beliefs about the subject matter that are very difficult to overcome.

    “McDevitt and Ormrod (2008) identified as a problem that college students in child development classes come in with beliefs about the subject matter that are incorrect (such as the belief that intelligence is fixed or that classroom behavior problems are the result of poor parenting) but which are very difficult to overcome.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDevitt, T. M., & Ormrod, J. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Northern Colorado (US)
  • University of New Hampshire (US)
Corresponding author
McDevitt, Teresa M
Venue
Child Development Perspectives
Published
2008-07-11
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
85-91
ISSN
  • 1750-8592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-8606
OpenAlex
W2027227084
Cited by
23
References
81
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Child Development Perspectives (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
conceptual change, child development education, pre-service teachers, university students, transfer of learning, student misconceptions, teacher professional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review