Cited by 435Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionBehavioral Health and Interventions

Accepting threatening information: Self‐affirmation and the reduction of defensive biases

Sherman, David K., Cohen, Geoffrey L.·2002·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Why do people resist evidence that challenges the validity of long–held beliefs? And why do they persist in maladaptive behavior even when persuasive information or personal experience recommends change? We argue that such defensive tendencies are driven, in large part, by a fundamental motivation to protect the perceived worth and integrity of the self. Studies of social–political debate, health–risk assessment, and responses to team victory or defeat have shown that people respond to information in a less defensive and more open–minded manner when their self–worth is buttressed by an affirmation of an alternative source of identity. Self–affirmed individuals are more likely to accept information that they would otherwise view as threatening, and subsequently to change their beliefs and even their behavior in a desirable fashion. Defensive biases have an adaptive function for maintaining self–worth, but maladaptive consequences for promoting change and reducing social conflict.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8721.00182

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Researchers have shown that individuals who are either personally affirmed or exposed to group-affirming stimuli thereafter display less bias when processing information that is contrary to beliefs dominantly held by their peers.

    “Researchers have shown that individuals who are either personally affirmed or exposed to group-affirming stimuli thereafter display less bias when processing information that is contrary to beliefs dominantly held by their peers (Cohen, 2000;Sherman & Cohen, 2002;Cohen et al., in press).”
  • Self-affirmation theory proposes a third alternative response to threats: affirming alternative self-resources unrelated to the provoking threat, which can enable both restoration of self-integrity and adaptive behavior change.

    “Self-aYrmation theory proposes a third alternative, a diVerent kind of psychological adaptation-one that, under many circumstances, enables both the restoration of self-integrity and adaptive behavior change.”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Sherman & Cohen, 2002

  • Defensive adaptations can be reduced or even eliminated through the process of self-affirmation.

    “One way that these defensive adaptations can be reduced, or even eliminated, is through the process of self-aYrmation (Aronson, Cohen, & Nail, 1999;Sherman & Cohen, 2002;Steele, 1988).”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Sherman & Cohen, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Sherman, David K.
  • Cohen, Geoffrey L.
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2002-08
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
119-123
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2146463557
Cited by
435
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 17
FWCI
35.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
self-affirmation, belief revision, self-worth, identity affirmation, persuasion, health risk assessment, social conflict, openness to experience, behavior change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review