Cited by 246Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

“I know, you know”: epistemic egocentrism in children and adults

Royzman, Edward B., Cassidy, Kimberly Wright, Baron, Jonathan·2003·Review of General Psychology

Abstract

This article reviews the evidence and theory pertaining to a form of perspective-taking failure—a difficulty in setting aside the privileged information that one knows to be unavailable to another party. The authors argue that this bias (epistemic egocentrism, or EE) is a general feature of human cognition and has been tapped by 2 independent and largely uncommunicating research traditions: the theory-of-mind tradition in developmental psychology and, with more sensitive probes, the “heuristics and biases” tradition in the psychology of human judgment. This article sets the stage for facilitating communication between these traditions as well as for the recognition of EE's breadth and potential interdisciplinary significance: The authors propose a life-span account and a tentative taxonomy of EE; and they highlight the interdisciplinary significance of EE by discussing its implications for normative ethics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.38

Cites

149 of 149 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Royzman, E. B., Cassidy, K. W., & Baron, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Bryn Mawr College (US)
Corresponding author
Royzman, Edward B.
Venue
Review of General Psychology
Published
2003-03
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
38-65
ISSN
  • 1089-2680 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1552
OpenAlex
W2168188972
Cited by
246
References
141
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of General Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Keywords
theory of mind, heuristics and biases, privileged information, epistemic bias, lifespan development, normative ethics, children and adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review