The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Imagined Intergroup Contact: Theory, Paradigm and Practice
Abstract
In this article, we outline a new implementation of intergroup contact theory: imagined intergroup contact. The approach combines 50 years of research into the effects of contact with recent advances in social cognition. It represents both a versatile experimental paradigm for investigating the extended and indirect impacts of social contact, as well as a flexible and effective tool for practitioners and policy makers in their efforts to promote tolerance for multicultural diversity. We describe the theoretical basis for imagined contact effects, document emerging empirical support, and provide a practical guide for researchers wishing to adopt the paradigm. Finally, we discuss the potential application of imagined contact in educational contexts, and how it could be integrated with existing approaches to provide maximally effective strategies for improving intergroup relations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984
A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006) · Journal of personality and social psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751 · Cited by 9,708
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65 · Cited by 6,001
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.9.954 · Cited by 5,806
Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G., & Thompson, W. L. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35090055 · Cited by 1,894
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228 · Cited by 1,845
Tropp, L. R., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167205274854 · Cited by 330
Cited by
Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review
Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004 · Cited by 6,686
Emotional Aging: Recent Findings and Future Trends
Scheibe, S., & Carstensen, L. L. (2010) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbp132 · Cited by 688
Communal and Agentic Content in Social Cognition
Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2014) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800284-1.00004-7 · Cited by 669
Lemmer, G., & Wagner, U. (2015) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2079 · Cited by 522
Neither Fish nor Fowl: Implicit Attitudes as Patchy Endorsements
Levy, N. (2015) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12074 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Crisp, R. J., Stathi, S., Turner, R. N., & Husnu, S.
- Venue
- Social and Personality Psychology Compass
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-18
- ISSN
- 1751-9004 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1964287037
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 31.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imagined Intergroup Contact: Theory, Paradigm and Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00155.x
- The paper
- Crisp, R. J., Stathi, S., Turner, R. N., & Husnu, S. (2009). Imagined Intergroup Contact: Theory, Paradigm and Practice. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00155.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
