The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experience Sampling Methods: A Modern Idiographic Approach to Personality Research
Open accessAbstract
Experience sampling methods are essential tools for building a modern idiographic approach to understanding personality. These methods yield multiple snapshots of people's experiences over time in daily life and allow researchers to identify patterns of behavior within a given individual, rather than strictly identify patterns of behavior across individuals, as with standard nomothetic approaches. In this article, we discuss the origin and evolution of idiographic methods in the field of personality and explain how experience sampling methods function as modern day idiographic methods in this field. We then review four primary ways in which experience sampling methods have been used to foster idiographic approaches in personality research. Specifically, we highlight approaches that examine individual differences in temporal and behavioral distributions, situation–behavior contingencies, daily processes, and the structure of daily experience. Following a brief methodology primer, we end by discussing future directions for idiographic experience sampling approaches in personality psychology and beyond.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The critical incident technique.
Flanagan, J. C. (1954) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0061470 · Cited by 8,191
Ecological momentary assessment
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · Cited by 6,454
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.246 · Cited by 3,889
Mediators and Mechanisms of Change in Psychotherapy Research
Kazdin, A. E. (2007) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091432 · Cited by 2,504 · cited 1×
“Despite clinical psychology's success in developing empirically validated treatments, the assumed mechanisms of even its most successful treatments have been called into question (Kazdin, 2007; Morgenstern & Longabaugh, 2000).”
BackgroundThe stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time.
Epstein, S. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.7.1097 · Cited by 1,468
Fleeson, W. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011 · Cited by 1,436
Self-citationPatient non-compliance with paper diaries
Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Hufford, M. R. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1193 · Cited by 810
The ecology of adolescent activity and experience
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R., & Prescott, S. (1977) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/bf02138940 · Cited by 781
Discrete Emotions or Dimensions? The Role of Valence Focus and Arousal Focus
Barrett, L. F. (1998) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/026999398379574 · Cited by 645 · cited 3×
“This approach has been used frequently to reveal intra-individual variations in the structure of emotional experience (Barrett, 1998; Carstensen, Pasupathi, Mayer, & Nesselroade, 2000).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationSituation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior
Fleeson, W. (2007) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00458.x · Cited by 455
Self-citation
Cited by
Comorbidity: a network perspective
Cramer, A. O. J., Waldorp, L. J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Borsboom, D. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x09991567 · Cited by 1,575
The relation between valence and arousal in subjective experience.
Kuppens, P., Tuerlinckx, F., Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0030811 · Cited by 583
Self-citationHamaker, E. L., Asparouhov, T., Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., & Muthén, B. (2018) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2018.1446819 · Cited by 549
Post–traumatic growth as positive personality change: Evidence, controversies and future directions
Jayawickreme, E., & Blackie, L. E. R. (2014) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.1963 · Cited by 555
Vazire, S., & Mehl, M. R. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013314 · Cited by 458
Metadata
- Authors
- Conner, T. S., Tennen, H., Fleeson, W., & Barrett, L. F.
- Venue
- Social and Personality Psychology Compass
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 292-313
- ISSN
- 1751-9004 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152824689
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 11.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experience Sampling Methods: A Modern Idiographic Approach to Personality Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00170.x
- The paper
- Conner, T. S., Tennen, H., Fleeson, W., & Barrett, L. F. (2009). Experience Sampling Methods: A Modern Idiographic Approach to Personality Research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00170.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
