Cited by 458Personality Traits and PsychologyAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychological Testing and Assessment

Knowing me, knowing you: The accuracy and unique predictive validity of self-ratings and other-ratings of daily behavior.

Vazire, Simine, Mehl, Matthias R.·2008·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Many people assume that they know themselves better than anyone else knows them. Recent research on inaccuracies in self-perception, however, suggests that self-knowledge may be more limited than people typically assume. In this article, the authors examine the possibility that people may know a person as well as (or better than) that person knows himself or herself. In Study 1, the authors document the strength of laypeople's beliefs that the self is the best expert. In Study 2, the authors provide a direct test of self- and other-accuracy using an objective and representative behavioral criterion. To do this, the authors compared self- and other-ratings of daily behavior to real-life measures of act frequencies assessed unobtrusively over 4 days. Our results show that close others are as accurate as the self in predicting daily behavior. Furthermore, accuracy varies across behaviors for both the self and for others, and the two perspectives often independently predict behavior. These findings suggest that there is no single perspective from which a person is known best and that both the self and others possess unique insight into how a person typically behaves.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0013314

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vazire, S., & Mehl, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2008-11
Volume
95
Issue
5
Pages
1202-1216
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2111210873
Cited by
458
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 23
FWCI
25.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH64527-01A1; MH52391)
  • National Science Foundation (0422924)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
self-knowledge, self-perception, self-other differences, daily behavior, close others
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Character, Female, Humans, Individuality, Interpersonal Relations, Judgment, Male, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Social Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review