CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 265Personality Traits and PsychologySocial and Intergroup PsychologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 119 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self‐Knowledge of Personality: Do People Know Themselves?

Vazire, Simine, Carlson, Erika N.·2010·Social and Personality Psychology Compass
DOI 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00280.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract The intuition that we have privileged and unrestricted access to ourselves – that we inevitably know who we are, how we feel, what we do, and what we think – is very compelling. Here, we review three types of evidence about the accuracy of self‐perceptions of personality and conclude that the glass is neither full nor empty. First, studies comparing self‐perceptions of personality to objective criteria suggest that self‐perceptions are at least tethered to reality – people are not completely clueless about how they behave, but they are also far from perfect. Second, studies examining how well people’s self‐perceptions agree with others’ perceptions of them suggest that people’s self‐views are not completely out of synch with how they are seen by those who know them best, but they are also far from identical. Third, studies examining whether people know the impressions they make on others suggest that people do have some glimmer of insight into the fact that others see them differently than they see themselves but there is still a great deal people do not know about how others see them. The findings from all three approaches point to the conclusion that self‐knowledge exists but leaves something to be desired. The status of people’s self‐knowledge about their own personality has vast implications both for our conception of ourselves as rational agents and for the methods of psychological inquiry.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00280.x

Cites

119 of 119 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 110 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Allen W., 1996, Deconstructing Harry
  2. Anderson R. D.(1984).Measuring social self‐perception: How accurately can individuals predict how others view them?Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Connecticut Storrs.
  3. Doris J. M., A Natural History of the Self
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.149 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Oliver P. V., 1989, Effects of need for social approval on first interactions among members of the opposite sex, Dissertation Abstracts International, 50
  6. Ozer D. J., 1991, Perspectives in Personality, Vol. 3. Part A: Self and Emotion; Part B: Approaches to Understanding Lives, 91
  7. Plato, 2006, Alcibiades I and II
  8. Reed L., 1996, I will be Your Mirror. On The Velvet Underground & Nico
  9. Russo R., 1998, Straight Man

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–265 of 265

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Vazire, S., & Carlson, E. N.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
ORCID
Venue
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-08
Volume
4
Issue
8
Pages
605-620
ISSN
1751-9004 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00280.x
OpenAlex
W2133806650
Cited by
265
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
FWCI
11.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 1 d)
Locations
Social and Personality Psychology Compass (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
self-knowledge, self-perception accuracy, self-other agreement, impression formation, self-reflection, rational agency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review