Cited by 746Crime Patterns and InterventionsPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Multisystemic treatment of serious juvenile offenders: Long-term prevention of criminality and violence.

Borduin, Charles M., Mann, Barton J., Cone, Lynn T., Henggeler, Scott W., Fucci, Bethany R., Blaske, David M., Williams, Robert A.·1995·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

This article examined the long-term effects of multisystemic therapy (MST) vs. individual therapy (IT) on the prevention of criminal behavior and violent offending among 176 juvenile offenders at high risk for committing additional serious crimes. Results from multiagent, multimethod assessment batteries conducted before and after treatment showed that MST was more effective than IT in improving key family correlates of antisocial behavior and in ameliorating adjustment problems in individual family members. Moreover, results from a 4-year follow-up of rearrest data showed that MST was more effective than IT in preventing future criminal behavior, including violent offending. The implications of such findings for the design of violence prevention programs are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.63.4.569

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some intensive community-based programs have produced outcomes important to communities and have been successfully disseminated.

    “By addressing some of these factors, some intensive community-based programs (i.e., Multisystemic Therapy [MST] for delinquent youth [Borduin et al., 1995], Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care [MTFC] for children in out-of-home placement [Chamberlain, Leve, & Degarmo, 2007]) have produced outcomes important to communities and have been successfully disseminated.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borduin, C. M., Mann, B. J., Cone, L. T., Henggeler, S. W., Fucci, B. R., Blaske, D. M., & Williams, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1995-08
Volume
63
Issue
4
Pages
569-578
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2159943520
Cited by
746
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 30
FWCI
87.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
multisystemic therapy, juvenile offenders, violent offending, recidivism, individual psychotherapy, family intervention, antisocial behavior, family adjustment, violence prevention, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Crime, Family, Humans, Juvenile Delinquency, Peer Group, Psychotherapy, Violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review