Cited by 73Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingFood and Agricultural SciencesFood Industry and Aquatic Biology

Functional Foods: The Western Consumer Viewpoint

Hilliam, Moira·2009·Nutrition Reviews

Abstract

Moira Hilliam, B.Sc.(Hons.); Functional Foods: the Western Consumer Viewpoint, Nutrition Reviews, Volume 54, Issue 11, 1 November 1996, Pages S189–S194, https:/

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1996.tb03846.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hilliam, M.
Affiliations
Leatherhead Food Research (GB)
Corresponding author
Hilliam, Moira
Venue
Nutrition Reviews
Published
2009-04-27
Volume
54
Issue
11
Pages
S189-S194
ISSN
  • 0029-6643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-4887
OpenAlex
W2029247943
Cited by
73
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Industry and Aquatic Biology
Keywords
functional foods, consumer attitudes, Western consumers, consumer perception, health claims
MeSH terms
Attitude, Fish Oils, Food, Health Promotion, Humans, Minerals, Oligosaccharides, Preventive Medicine, Vitamins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review