Cited by 76Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorConsumer behavior in food and health

Understanding variations in the consumption of functional foods – Evidence from Croatia

Brečić, Ružica, Gorton, Matthew, Barjolle, Dominique·2014·British Food Journal

Abstract

Purpose – Drawing on a representative survey, this paper aims to identify the determinants of functional food consumption in Croatia. The objective is to introduce and test a conceptual model that four sets of factors (food choice motivations, demographic and socio-economic characteristics, knowledge of functional food and health status) underpin variations in functional food consumption. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected via face-to-face interviews conducted in respondents' homes. Consumption of functional foods is modelled as a bootstrapped ordered probit model. Findings – Results confirm the significant influence of all four sets of factors for explaining variations in functional food consumption. Heavier users of functional food are those that place a greater weighting on health and convenience in food choice. In contrast, the salience of familiarity in food choice is negatively related with functional food consumption. Females and those with higher levels of educational attainment are heavier consumers of functional food. While perceived health status appears not to have any significant relationship with functional food consumption, there is a link with body mass index. Functional foods appeal most to those concerned about their health and desire convenient, “quick fixes”. Such “quick fixes” may however be employed at the expense of more fundamental adjustments to diet and fitness, which may provide the basis for superior overall disease prevention/health promotion. Originality/value – The study represents one of the first assessments of functional food consumption in Central and Eastern Europe, introducing and testing a comprehensive conceptual model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/bfj-05-2012-0133

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brečić, R., Gorton, M., & Barjolle, D.
Affiliations
  • Ekonomski fakultet - Zagreb (HR)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
British Food Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2014-04-01
Volume
116
Issue
4
Pages
662-675
ISSN
0007-070X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994745842
Cited by
76
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Food Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
Keywords
functional food consumption, food choice determinants, food choice motives, health perception, body mass index, gender differences, educational attainment, socioeconomic factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review