The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive Penetration of Colour Experience: Rethinking the Issue in Light of an Indirect Mechanism
Abstract
Can the phenomenal character of perceptual experience be altered by the states of one’s cognitive system, for example, one’s thoughts or beliefs? If one thinks that this can happen (at least in certain ways that are identified in the paper) then one thinks that there can be cognitive penetration of perceptual experience; otherwise, one thinks that perceptual experience is cognitively impenetrable. I claim that there is one alleged case of cognitive penetration that cannot be explained away by the standard strategies one can typically use to explain away alleged cases. The case is one in which it seems subjects’ beliefs about the typical colour of objects affects their colour experience. I propose a two-step mechanism of indirect cognitive penetration that explains how cognitive penetration may occur. I show that there is independent evidence that each step in this process can occur. I suspect that people who are opposed to the idea that perceptual experience is cognitively penetrable will be less opposed to the idea when they come to consider this indirect mechanism and that those who are generally sympathetic to the idea of cognitive penetrability will welcome the elucidation of this plausible mechanism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fodor, J. A. (1983) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001 · Cited by 7,734
Nagel, T. (1974) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2183914 · Cited by 7,440
Cummins, R., & Fodor, J. (1985) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184717 · Cited by 4,791
Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind
Churchland, P. M. (1979) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625435 · Cited by 1,427
Is vision continuous with cognition?: The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception
Pylyshyn, Z. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002022 · Cited by 1,243
Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination
Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M. C., Wu, L., Wade, A. R., & Boroditsky, L. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701644104 · Cited by 1,021
Austin, J. L. (1962) · Cited by 902
Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention
(2004) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524861.001.0001 · Cited by 791
Kosslyn, S. M. (1990) · Cited by 715
Sound alters visual motion perception
Sekuler, R., Sekuler, A. B., & Lau, R. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/385308a0 · Cited by 685
Cited by
Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects
Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x15000965 · Cited by 1,200
Linguistically Modulated Perception and Cognition: The Label-Feedback Hypothesis
Lupyan, G. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00054 · Cited by 512
The Border Between Seeing and Thinking
Block, N. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197622223.001.0001 · Cited by 367
Nanay, B. (2018) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.006 · Cited by 299
Varieties of cognitive penetration in visual perception
Vetter, P., & Newen, A. (2014) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.04.007 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- MACPHERSON, F.
- Venue
- Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-02-17
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-62
- ISSN
- 0031-8205 (ISSN-L)
- 1933-1592
- OpenAlex
- W1864975167
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 20.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive Penetration of Colour Experience: Rethinking the Issue in Light of an Indirect Mechanism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00481.x
- The paper
- MACPHERSON, F. (2012). Cognitive Penetration of Colour Experience: Rethinking the Issue in Light of an Indirect Mechanism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00481.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.