The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bullying in school: Evaluation and dissemination of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program.
Abstract
The nature and extent of bullying among school children is discussed, and recent attention to the phenomenon by researchers, the media, and policy makers is noted. The Olweus Bullying Prevention Program (OBPP) is a comprehensive, school-wide program that was designed to reduce bullying and achieve better peer relations among students in elementary, middle, and junior high school grades. Several large-scale studies from Norway are reviewed, which provide compelling evidence of the program's effectiveness in Norwegian schools. Studies that have evaluated the OBPP in diverse settings in the United States have not been uniformly consistent, but they have shown that the OBPP has had a positive impact on students' self-reported involvement in bullying and antisocial behavior. Efforts to disseminate the OBPP in Norway and the United States are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00629 · Cited by 2,694
Standards of Evidence: Criteria for Efficacy, Effectiveness and Dissemination
Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., Mościcki, E. K., Schinke, S., Valentine, J. C., & Ji, P. (2005) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-005-5553-y · Cited by 1,338
Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools?: An evidentiary review and recommendations
American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force (2008) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.63.9.852 · Cited by 806
Bully/victim problems in school: Facts and intervention
Olweus, D. (1997) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/bf03172807 · Cited by 724
Self-citation
Cited by
Yeager, D. S., Fong, C. J., Lee, H. Y., & Espelage, D. L. (2015) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.005 · Cited by 472
Bullying in children: impact on child health
Armitage, R. (2021) · BMJ Paediatrics Open · doi:10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000939 · Cited by 337
Traditional bullying as a potential warning sign of cyberbullying
Kowalski, R. M., Morgan, C. A., & Limber, S. P. (2012) · School Psychology International · doi:10.1177/0143034312445244 · Cited by 310
Implementation Science in School Mental Health: Key Constructs in a Developing Research Agenda
Owens, J. S., Lyon, A. R., Brandt, N. E., Masia Warner, C., Nadeem, E., Spiel, C., & Wagner, M. (2014) · School Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s12310-013-9115-3 · Cited by 247
A response to intervention model to promote school attendance and decrease school absenteeism
Kearney, C. A., & Graczyk, P. (2014) · Child & Youth Care Forum · doi:10.1007/s10566-013-9222-1 · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P.
- Venue
- American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 124-134
- ISSN
- 0002-9432 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0025
- OpenAlex
- W2133643830
- Cited by
- 759
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 34.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
