Cited by 25Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Detection of selection signatures for agonistic behaviour in cattle

Open access
Eusebi, P.G., Cortés, O., Carleos, C., Dunner, S., Cañon, J.·2018·Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics

Abstract

Summary: The identification of genomic regions including signatures of selection produced by domestication and its subsequent artificial selection processes allows the understanding of the evolution of bovine breeds. Although several studies describe the genomic variability among meat or milk production cattle breeds, there are limited studies orientated towards bovine behavioural features. This study is focused on mapping genomic signatures of selection which may provide insights of differentiation between neutral and selected polymorphisms. Their effects are studied in the Lidia cattle traditionally selected for agonistic behaviour compared with Spanish breeds showing tamed behaviour. Two different approaches, BayeScan and SelEstim, were applied using genotypic 50K SNP BeadChip data. Both procedures detected two genomic regions bearing genes previously related to behavioural traits. The frequencies of the selected allele in these two regions in Lidia breed were opposite to those found in the tamed breeds. In these genomic regions, several putative genes associated with enriched metabolic pathways related to the behavioural development were identified, as neurochondrin gene (NCDN) or glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 3 (GRIK 3) both located at BTA 3 or leucine‐rich repeat and Ig domain containing 2 (LINGO 2) and phospholipase A2‐activating protein (PLAA) at BTA 8.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jbg.12325

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A polymorphism in the promoter of the MAOA gene is among the genomic divergences in the Lidia breed.

    “This includes a polymorphism in the promoter of the monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) gene, an important locus widely associated with pathological forms of aggression which, in humans, manifests in a broad spectrum of psychiatric conditions, such as manic and bipolar disorders and schizophrenia, among others [17, 18].”
  • A recent study identified significant divergence in genomic regions containing genes associated with aggressive behavior in the Lidia breed.

    “A recent study has identified significant divergence in genomic regions containing genes associated with aggressive behavior in the Lidia breed [16].”
  • The kainate glutamate receptor GRIK3 is associated with heightened aggression in Lidia cattle.

    “Similarly, the kainite glutamate receptor GRIK3 is associated with heightened aggression in Lidia cattle.”
  • GRIK3 has been targeted in modern human evolution and in multiple domestication events, including in dogs, sheep, yaks, and across multiple cattle breeds.

    “This gene has been targeted in modern human evolution and in multiple domestication events, including in dogs, sheep, yaks, and across multiple cattle breeds [16, 19, 20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. González-Rodríguez A., Munilla S., Mouresan E. F., Cañas-Álvarez J. J., Día, C., Piedrafita J., Altarriba J., Baro J.A., Molina A. & Varona, L. (2016). On the performance of tests for the detection of signatures of selection: a case study with the Spanish autochthonous beef cattle populations. Gen. Sel. Evol ., 48 (1), 81.
  2. Grafman J., Schwab K., Warden D., Pridgen A., Brown H. R. & Salazar A. M. (1996). Frontal lobe injuries, violence, and aggression a report of the vietnam head injury study. Neurology , 46 (5), 1231-1231.
  3. Jensen, P. (2006). Domestication-from behavior to genes and back again. Applied Anim.l Behav. Sci. 97 (1), 3-15.
  4. Makina S. O., Muchadeyi F. C., Marle-Köster E., Taylor J. F., Makgahlela M. L., & Maiwashe A. (2015). Genome-wide scan for selection signatures in six cattle breeds in South Africa. Gen. Sel. Evol. , 47 (1), 92.
  5. Moyano S., Del Río J. & Frechilla, D. (2004). Role of hippocampal CaMKII in serotonin 5HT1A receptor-mediated learning deficit in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology , 29 (12), 2216.
  6. Ramey H. R., Decker J. E., McKay S. D., Rolf M. M., Schnabel R. D., & Taylor J. F. (2013). Detection of selective sweeps in cattle using genome-wide SNP data. BMC genomics ., 14 (1), 382.
  7. Shinozaki K., Maruyama K., Kume H., Kuzume H. & Obata K. (1997). A novel brain gene, norbin, induced by treatment of tetraethylammonium in rat hippocampal slice and accompanied with neurite-outgrowth in neuro 2a cells. Biochem.Biophys. Res. Commun. , 240 (3), 766-771.
  8. Zhang C. (2010). Gap junctions in olfactory neurons modulate olfactory sensitivity. BMC Neurosci. , 11 (1), 108.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eusebi, P. G., Cortés, O., Carleos, C., Dunner, S., & Cañon, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
  • Universidad de Oviedo (ES)
  • Departamento de Producción Animal Facultad de Veterinaria Universidad Complutense de Madrid Madrid Spain
Corresponding author
Eusebi, P.G.
Venue
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-26
Volume
135
Issue
3
Pages
170-177
ISSN
  • 0044-3581 (ISSN-L)
  • 0931-2668
  • 1439-0388
OpenAlex
W2802429197
Cited by
25
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Consultation of the Doctoral Thesis Database (TESEO) (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
selection signatures, agonistic behavior, cattle, Lidia cattle, behavioral characteristics, domestication, selective breeding, BayeScan, SNP genotyping, GRIK3, cattle breeds
MeSH terms
Selective Breeding, Agonistic Behavior, Animals, Bayes Theorem, Cattle, Genetic Markers, Genotype, Phenotype, Selection, Genetic, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genetic Association Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review