Cited by 169Coral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesGenetic diversity and population structureMarine Biology and Ecology Research

Blind to morphology: genetics identifies several widespread ecologically common species and few endemics among Indo‐Pacific cauliflower corals ( Pocillopora , Scleractinia)

Pinzón, Jorge H., Sampayo, Eugenia, Cox, Evelyn, Chauka, Leonard J., Chen, Chaolun Allen, Voolstra, Christian R., LaJeunesse, Todd C.·2013·Journal of Biogeography

Abstract

Aim: Using high‐resolution genetic markers on samples gathered from across their wide distributional range, we endeavoured to delimit species diversity in reef‐building Pocillopora corals. They are common, ecologically important, and widespread throughout the Indo‐Pacific, but their phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental conditions and their nearly featureless microskeletal structures confound taxonomic assignments and limit an understanding of their ecology and evolution. Location: Indo‐Pacific, Red Sea, Arabian/Persian Gulf. Methods: Sequence analysis of nuclear ribosomal (internal transcribed spacer 2, ITS 2) and mitochondrial (open reading frame) loci were combined with population genetic data (seven microsatellite loci) for Pocillopora samples collected throughout the Indo‐Pacific, Red Sea and Arabian Gulf, in order to assess the evolutionary divergence, reproductive isolation, frequency of hybridization and geographical distributions of the genus. Results: Between five and eight genetically distinct lineages comparable to species were identified with minimal or no hybridization between them. Colony morphology was generally incongruent with genetics across the full range of sampling, and the total number of species is apparently consistent with lower estimates from competing morphologically based hypotheses (about seven or eight taxa). The most commonly occurring genetic lineages were widely distributed and exhibited high dispersal and gene flow, factors that have probably minimized allopatric speciation. Uniquely among scleractinian genera, this genus contains a monophyletic group of broadcast spawners that evolved recently from an ancestral brooder. Main conclusions: The delineation of species diversity guided by genetics fundamentally advances our understanding of Pocillopora geographical distributions, ecology and evolution. Because traditional diagnostic features of colony and branch morphology are proving to be of limited utility, the identification of Pocillopora species for future ecological and experimental work should rely on genetic characters that will improve research and aid in conservation strategies for these and other reef‐building corals, including the detection of real and mistaken endemic populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jbi.12110

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Strong isolation of Red Sea populations from the Western Indian Ocean has previously been reported for corals, fishes, arthropods, echinoderms, molluscs and sponges, although some studies found no barriers for some fish species.

    “Strong isolation of Red Sea populations from the WIO has been previously reported for corals (Pinzón et al. 2013), fishes (discussed, e.g., in Froukh and Kochzius 2008;DiBattista et al. 2013DiBattista et al. , 2016)), arthropods (e.g., Iacchei et al. 2016), echinoderms (Vogler et al. 2008), molluscs (e.g., Hui et al. 2016) and sponges (Wörheide et al. 2008), although some studies found no”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pinzón, J. H., Sampayo, E., Cox, E., Chauka, L. J., Chen, C. A., Voolstra, C. R., & LaJeunesse, T. C.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • University of Dar es Salaam (TZ)
  • Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica (TW)
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
Corresponding author
LaJeunesse, Todd C.
Venue
Journal of Biogeography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-05
Volume
40
Issue
8
Pages
1595-1608
ISSN
  • 0305-0270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2699
OpenAlex
W2149681625
Cited by
169
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5
FWCI
13.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biogeography (publishedVersion)
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Repository (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
Keywords
Pocillopora, species delimitation, coral taxonomy, hybridization, reproductive isolation, gene flow, dispersal, morphological plasticity, monophyly, broadcast spawning, endemic populations, Indo-Pacific, Red Sea, Persian Gulf, coral conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review