Cited by 39Online Learning and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEducational and Technological Research

Learning analytics driven improvements in learning design in higher education: A systematic literature review

Drugova, Elena, Zhuravleva, Irina, Zakharova, Ulyana, Latipov, Adel·2024·Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Abstract

Background: Driven by the ongoing need to provide high‐quality learning and teaching, universities recently have shown an increased interest in using learning analytics (LA) for improving learning design (LD). However, the evidence of such improvements is scarce, and the maturity of such research is unclear. Objectives: This study is aimed to evaluate the maturity of research discussing LA‐driven LD improvements in higher education. Methods: The systematic review analyses 49 empirical papers, assesses their quality and suggests further research directions. The review elaborates on methodological (research questions, strategy and methods, LA‐LD integration theoretical backgrounds) and substantial (LA‐driven LD improvements, types of data used, LA software development) features of the papers. Results and Conclusions: The findings demonstrated the lack of theoretical alignment between LA and LD, with research tending towards user experience studies. The most frequently used research strategy was a case study; experiments were very rare. Researchers predominantly used parsing for collecting data and AI methods for analysing it; mostly used data types related to registering learners' engagement with learning activities as well as resources and tools provided in digital learning environments. Takeaways: The research area discussing LA‐driven LD improvements still has a way to go before attaining the level of full maturity. Only a third of the papers reported actual LA‐driven LD improvements; moreover, only three papers measured their effectiveness. The presented LA software was mostly at the beta or implementation stages and did not assess the impact of using this software.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcal.12894

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Guzmán-Valenzuela et al. (2021) critiqued the prevailing focus on analytics over substantive learning improvements, advocating for a balanced approach valuing pedagogical effectiveness alongside technological advancements.

    “They critiqued the prevailing focus on analytics over substantive learning improvements, advocating for a balanced approach that equally values pedagogical effectiveness alongside technological advancements (Drugova et al., 2024).”
  • A lack of theoretical grounding in LA reviews includes the framing of research questions.

    “including the framing of research questions (Drugova et al., 2024)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drugova, E., Zhuravleva, I., Zakharova, U., & Latipov, A.
Affiliations
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
Corresponding author
Drugova, Elena
Venue
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-10-23
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
510-524
ISSN
  • 0266-4909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2729
OpenAlex
W4387868840
Cited by
39
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational and Technological Research
Keywords
learning analytics, learning design, higher education, research maturity, student engagement, digital learning environments, user experience, research quality, effectiveness measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review