The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Signalling mechanisms that regulate metabolic profile and autophagy of acute myeloid leukaemia cells
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) comprises a heterogeneous group of hematologic neoplasms characterized by diverse combinations of genetic, phenotypic and clinical features representing a major challenge for the development of targeted therapies. Metabolic reprogramming, mainly driven by deregulation of the nutrient‐sensing pathways as AMPK, mTOR and PI 3K/AKT, has been associated with cancer cells, including AML cells, survival and proliferation. Nevertheless, the role of these metabolic adaptations on the AML pathogenesis is still controversial. In this work, the metabolic status and the respective metabolic networks operating in different AML cells (NB‐4, HL‐60 and KG‐1) and their impact on autophagy and survival was characterized. Data show that whereas KG‐1 cells exhibited preferential mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation metabolism with constitutive co‐activation of AMPK and mTORC 1 associated with increased autophagy, NB‐4 and HL‐60 cells displayed a dependent glycolytic profile mainly associated with AKT/mTORC 1 activation and low autophagy flux. Inhibition of AKT is disclosed as a promising therapeutical target in some scenarios while inhibition of AMPK and mTORC 1 has no major impact on KG‐1 cells’ survival. The results highlight an exclusive metabolic profile for each tested AML cells and its impact on determination of the anti‐leukaemia efficacy and on personalized combinatory therapy with conventional and targeted agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“MTOR suppression does not always induce autophagy, such as when BECN1 undergoes inhibitory phosphorylation by the growth factor signaling molecules EGFR and AKT, when microglia are activated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a TLR4 ligand [766], or during Salmonella infection [767-769].”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [768]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition).
Klionsky, D. J., Abdelmohsen, K., Abe, A., Abedin, M. J., Abeliovich, H., Acevedo Arozena, A., Adachi, H., Adams, C. M., Adams, P. D., Adeli, K., et al. (2016) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356 · Cited by 5,894
Self-citationRegulation and function of ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K) within mTOR signalling networks
Magnuson, B., Ekim, B., & Fingar, D. C. (2012) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20110892 · Cited by 1,015
Akt-Mediated Regulation of Autophagy and Tumorigenesis Through Beclin 1 Phosphorylation
Wang, R. C., Wei, Y., An, Z., Zou, Z., Xiao, G., Bhagat, G., White, M., Reichelt, J., & Levine, B. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225967 · Cited by 728
The autophagy initiating kinase ULK1 is regulated via opposing phosphorylation by AMPK and mTOR
Egan, D., Kim, J., Shaw, R. J., & Guan, K.-L. (2011) · Autophagy · doi:10.4161/auto.7.6.15123 · Cited by 627
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- 10.1056/NEJM199909303411407 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69780-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.exphem.2009.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood-2012-02-392506 · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.2907 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood-2010-05-260117 · DOI
- 10.1002/cncr.23000 · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.010 · DOI
- 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0345 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1160809 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1182/blood-2014-02-554204 · DOI
- 10.1189/jlb.0710417 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrd3504 · DOI
- 10.3324/haematol.2009.013797 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood-2006-12-061283 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood-2002-11-3429 · DOI
- 10.1038/leu.2017.81 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/leu.2013.107 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.stem.2015.08.019 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.063 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/23723556.2015.1071303 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood-2010-02-269837 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/leu.2011.339 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood-2004-06-2494 · DOI
- 10.18632/oncotarget.2947 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.01.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.01.017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/path.2697 · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.20101145 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1182/blood-2016-07-692707 · DOI
- 10.1615/CritRevEukarGeneExpr.v21.i1.50 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.05.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)64100-6 · DOI
- 10.1080/14728222.2017.1333600 · DOI
- 10.4161/cc.24700 · DOI
- 10.1042/bj3450437 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncb2329 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.15698/mic2016.12.546 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.09.023 · DOI
- 10.1186/s40591-015-0040-8 · DOI
- 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0441 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/cb900300j · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.5450 · DOI
- 10.3109/10428194.2010.512966 · DOI
- 10.3892/or.2013.2299 · DOI
- 10.1080/10245332.2017.1402454 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.03.008 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms13254 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/cddiscovery.2015.8 · DOI
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0764 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1
Klionsky, D. J., Abdel-Aziz, A. K., Abdelfatah, S., Abdellatif, M., Abdoli, A., Abel, S., Abeliovich, H., Abildgaard, M. H., Abudu, Y. P., Acevedo-Arozena, A., et al. (2021) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280 · Cited by 2,897
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pereira, O., Teixeira, A., Sampaio‐Marques, B., Castro, I., Girão, H., & Ludovico, P.
- Affiliations
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS) School of Medicine University of Minho Braga Portugal
- Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Life Science (IBILI) Faculty of Medicine University of Coimbra Coimbra Portugal
- ORCID
- Ludovico, Paula
- Venue
- Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-08-17
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4807-4817
- ISSN
- 1582-1838
- 1582-4934
- PMC
- PMC6156238
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/52292/2013, SFRH/BPD/90533/2012)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review