Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 220

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Research Review: Epidemiological modelling of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder and conduct disorder for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

Erskine, Holly E., Ferrari, Alize J., Nelson, Paul, Polanczyk, Guilherme V., Flaxman, Abraham D., Vos, Theo, Whiteford, Harvey A., Scott, James G.·2013·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: The most recent Global Burden of Disease Study ( GBD 2010) is the first to include attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) and conduct disorder ( CD ) for burden quantification. We present the epidemiological profiles of ADHD and CD across three time periods for 21 world regions. Methods: A systematic review of global epidemiology was conducted for each disorder (based on a literature search of the Medline, PsycInfo and EMBASE databases). A Bayesian metaregression tool was used to derive prevalence estimates by age and sex in three time periods (1990, 2005 and 2010) for 21 world regions including those with little or no data. Prior expert knowledge and covariates were applied to each model to adjust suboptimal data. Final prevalence output for ADHD were adjusted to reflect an equivalent value if studies had measured point prevalence using multiple informants while final prevalence output for CD were adjusted to reflect a value equivalent to CD only. Results: Prevalence was pooled for males and females aged 5–19 years with no difference found in global prevalence between the three time periods. Male prevalence of ADHD in 2010 was 2.2% (2.0–2.3) while female prevalence was 0.7% (0.6–0.7). Male prevalence of CD in 2010 was 3.6% (3.3–4.0) while female prevalence was 1.5% (1.4–1.7). ADHD and CD were estimated to be present worldwide with ADHD prevalence showing some regional variation while CD prevalence remained relatively consistent worldwide. Conclusions: We present the first prevalence estimates of both ADHD and CD globally and for all world regions. Data were sparse with large parts of the world having no estimates of either disorder. Epidemiological studies are urgently needed in certain parts of the world. Our findings directly informed burden quantification for GBD 2010. As mental disorders gained increased recognition after the first GBD study in 1990, the inclusion of ADHD and CD in GBD 2010 ensures their importance will be recognized alongside other childhood disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.12144

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1007/s00127-007-0293-x · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s00127-010-0242-y · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1097/01.CHI.0000070245.24125.B6 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1371/journal.pone.0047404 · DOI
  5. Faraone S.V., 2003, The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: Is it an American condition?, World Psychiatry, 2, 104
  6. Flaxman A.D., 2013, An integrative metaregression framework for descriptive epidemiology
  7. 10.1007/s00787-008-0677-9 · DOI
  8. Hebrani P., 2007, The prevalence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in preschool‐age children in Mashhad, north‐East of Iran, Archives of Iranian Medicine, 10, 147
  9. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb03367.x · DOI
  10. Kessler R.C., 2008, The WHO World Mental Health Surveys: Global perspectives on the epidemiology of mental disorders
  11. 10.1176/ajp.157.1.96 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1093/schbul/sbp004 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/ajmg.b.30764 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01823.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. Murray C.J.L., 1996, The Global Burden of Disease: A comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020
  16. 10.1176/ajp.155.7.862 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.6.942 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1037/1040-3590.10.3.250 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61238-0 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1037/a0020798 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1017/S1121189X00008502 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s00431-006-0299-5 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.21 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1017/S0033291709991504 · DOI
  25. United Nations, 2007, World population prospects: The 2006 revision, highlights
  26. United Nations, 2011, World population prospects—The 2010 revision, 10.18356/7d4bbbc8-en · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2000.101001002.x · DOI
  28. World Health Organisation, 1992, ICD‐10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines
  29. World Health Organization, 2008, The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 update
  30. World Health Organization, 2008, mhGAP: Mental Health Gap Action Programme: Scaling up care for mental, neurological and substance use disorders

Cited by

See all 220

Metadata

Authors
Erskine, H. E., Ferrari, A. J., Nelson, P., Polanczyk, G. V., Flaxman, A. D., Vos, T., Whiteford, H. A., & Scott, J. G.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10-04
Volume
54
Issue
12
Pages
1263-1274
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2058365290
Cited by
220
References
8
FWCI
11.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.