Cited by 73Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Parsing heterogeneity in attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder using EEG ‐based subgroups

Open access
Loo, Sandra K., McGough, James J., McCracken, James T., Smalley, Susan L.·2018·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) is a heterogeneous condition for which multiple efforts to characterize brain state differences are underway. The objective of this study was to identify distinct subgroups of resting electroencephalography ( EEG ) profiles among children with and without ADHD and subsequently provide extensive clinical characterization of the subgroups. Methods: Latent class analysis was used with resting state EEG recorded from a large sample of 781 children with and without ADHD ( N = 620 ADHD , N = 161 Control), aged 6–18 years old. Behavioral and cognitive characteristics of the latent classes were derived from semistructured diagnostic interviews, parent completed behavior rating scales, and cognitive test performance. Results: A five‐class solution was the best fit for the data, of which four classes had a defining spectral power elevation. The distribution of ADHD and control subjects was similar across classes suggesting there is no one resting state EEG profile for children with or without ADHD . Specific latent classes demonstrated distinct behavioral and cognitive profiles. Those with elevated slow‐wave activity (i.e. delta and theta band) had higher levels of externalizing behaviors and cognitive deficits. Latent subgroups with elevated alpha and beta power had higher levels of internalizing behaviors, emotion dysregulation, and intact cognitive functioning. Conclusions: There is population‐level heterogeneity in resting state EEG subgroups, which are associated with distinct behavioral and cognitive profiles. EEG measures may be more useful biomarkers of ADHD outcome or treatment response rather than diagnosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.12814

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Given the complexity and heterogeneity of neurodevelopmental disorders in terms of pathophysiology, it is highly unlikely that biomarker applications based on a single parameter will be meaningful in clinical practice.

    “Arguably, given the complexity and heterogeneity of neurodevelopmental disorders in terms of pathophysiology, it is highly unlikely that biomarker applications based on a single parameter will be meaningful in clinical practice 44-47 .”

    From Candidate diagnostic biomarkers for neurodevelopmental disorders in children and adolescents: a systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Discussion says no single EEG measure differentiates children with and without ADHD, supporting the concern about a single diagnostic biomarker. But the claim extends that finding to neurodevelopmental disorders generally and to all clinical applications; the Discussion and Conclusion say EEG measures may still be useful for predicting treatment response or developmental outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loo, S. K., McGough, J. J., McCracken, J. T., & Smalley, S. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Loo, Sandra K.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09-18
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
223-231
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2756093477
Cited by
73
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (MH58277, NS054124, MH077248)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, ADHD heterogeneity, resting-state EEG, latent class analysis, spectral power, slow-wave activity, delta and theta power, alpha and beta power, externalizing problems, internalizing problems, emotional dysregulation, cognitive impairment, children, biomarkers
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Affective Symptoms, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Behavioral Symptoms, Child, Child Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Brain Waves, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review