Cited by 68Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Predictors and moderators of recurring self‐harm in adolescents participating in a comparative treatment trial of psychological interventions

Adrian, Molly, McCauley, Elizabeth, Berk, Michele S., Asarnow, Joan R., Korslund, Kathryn, Avina, Claudia, Gallop, Robert, Linehan, Marsha M.·2019·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: In primary analyses, dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) was associated with greater reduction in self‐harm during treatment than individual/group supportive therapy (IGST). The objective of this paper was to examine predictors and moderators of treatment outcomes for suicidal adolescents who participated in a randomized controlled trial evaluating DBT and IGST. Methods: Adolescents ( N = 173) were included in the intent‐to‐treat sample and randomized to receive 6 months of DBT or IGST. Potential baseline predictors and moderators were identified within four categories: demographics, severity markers, parental psychopathology, and psychosocial variables. Primary outcomes were suicide attempts (SA) and nonsuicidal self‐injury evaluated at baseline, midtreatment (3 months), and end of treatment (6 months) via the Suicide Attempt and Self‐Injury Interview (Psychological Assessment, 18, 2006, 303). For each moderator or predictor, a generalized linear mixed model was conducted to examine main and interactive effects of treatment and the candidate variable on outcomes. Results: Adolescents with higher family conflict, more extensive self‐harm histories, and more externalizing problems produced on average more reduction on SH frequency from baseline to post‐treatment. Adolescents meeting BPD diagnosis were more likely to have high SH frequency at post‐treatment. Analyses indicated significant moderation effects for emotion dysregulation on NSSI and SH. DBT was associated with better rates of improvement compared to IGST for adolescents with higher baseline emotion dysregulation and those whose parents reported greater psychopathology and emotion dysregulation. A significant moderation effect for ethnicity on SA over the treatment period was observed, where DBT produced better rate of improvement compared to IGST for Hispanic/Latino individuals. Conclusions: These findings may help to inform salient treatment targets and guide treatment planning. Adolescents that have high levels of family conflict, externalizing problems, and increased level of severity markers demonstrated the most change in self‐harm behaviors over the course of treatment and benefitted from both treatment interventions. Those with higher levels of emotion dysregulation and parent psychopathology may benefit more from the DBT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.13099

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preliminary research provides tentative support for mechanisms of change in DBT-A.

    “Preliminary research provides tentative support for these mechanisms of change.”

    From Efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescent self-harm and suicidal ideation: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as Adrian et al., 2019

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says that adolescents and parents with higher baseline emotion dysregulation responded better to DBT than to supportive therapy, a finding the authors describe as aligning with DBT theory. This offers tentative, indirect support for a proposed mechanism, but the study tested baseline moderators of treatment response, not whether changes in those mechanisms caused improvement. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • DBT was associated with a better rate of improvement from baseline to post-treatment for adolescents who identified as Latinx, compared with their white counterparts.

    “For example, DBT was associated with a better rate of improvement from baseline to post-treatment for adolescents who identified as Latinx, compared with their white counterparts.143”

    From Suicide in young people: screening, risk assessment, and intervention (2023) · cites this paper as [143]

    The Results (Moderators) report a greater reduction in suicide attempts among Latino adolescents receiving DBT than among non-Latino adolescents receiving DBT (86.9% versus 67.5%). But the paper groups the comparison adolescents as non-Latino, not white, and its significant moderation finding compares DBT with IGST across ethnicity groups. It does not establish the stated comparison specifically with white counterparts. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Secondary analysis of McCauley et al. (2018) revealed that adolescents who reported higher emotion dysregulation at baseline, and whose parents reported greater psychopathology and emotion dysregulation, demonstrated greater reduction in self-harm following 6-months of DBT-A treatment.

    “Secondary analysis of McCauley et al. (2018) revealed that adolescents who reported higher emotion dysregulation at baseline, and whose parents reported greater psychopathology and emotion dysregulation demonstrated greater reduction in self-harm following 6-months of DBT-A treatment (Adrian et al., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. SAS Institute Inc. (2015). SAS® 9.4 Language Reference: Concepts, 5th Edition,. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adrian, M., McCauley, E., Berk, M. S., Asarnow, J. R., Korslund, K., Avina, C., Gallop, R., & Linehan, M. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • West Chester University (US)
Corresponding author
Adrian, Molly
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-07-30
Volume
60
Issue
10
Pages
1123-1132
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2964756638
Cited by
68
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
FWCI
9.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (5R01MH090159, R01MH93898)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K12022982)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
self-harm, adolescents, dialectical behavior therapy, suicide attempts, non-suicidal self-injury, emotional dysregulation, family conflict, externalizing problems, parental psychopathology, borderline personality disorder, ethnicity, suicidal adolescents
MeSH terms
Problem Behavior, Dialectical Behavior Therapy, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy, Group, Recurrence, Severity of Illness Index, Self-Injurious Behavior, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Family Conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review