Cited by 100Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Practitioner Review: Treatment for suicidal and self‐harming adolescents – advances in suicide prevention care

Asarnow, Joan Rosenbaum, Mehlum, Lars·2019·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Suicide is a leading cause of death globally in youths, and suicidal behavior and self‐harm are major clinical concerns. This article updates the previous practitioner review (2012) with the aims of integrating new research evidence, including that reported in this Special Issue. Methods: The article reviews scientific evidence related to steps in the care pathway for identifying and treating youths with elevated suicide/self‐harm risk, specifically: (a) screening and risk assessment; (b) treatment; and (c) community‐level suicide prevention strategies. Results: Review of current evidence indicates that major advances have been achieved in knowledge regarding clinical and preventive practices for reducing suicide and self‐harm risk in adolescents. The evidence supports the value of brief screeners for identifying youths with elevated suicide/self‐harm risk and the efficacy of some treatments for suicidal and self‐harm behavior. Dialectical behavior therapy currently meets Level 1 criteria (2 independent trials supporting efficacy) as the first well‐established treatment for self‐harm, and other approaches have shown efficacy in single randomized controlled trials. The effectiveness of some community‐based suicide prevention strategies for reducing suicide mortality and suicide attempt rates has been demonstrated. Conclusions: Current evidence can guide practitioners in delivering effective care for youth suicide/self‐harm risk. Treatments and preventive interventions that address the psychosocial environment and enhance the ability of trusted adults to protect and support youths, while also addressing the psychological needs of youths appear to yield the greatest benefits. Although additional research is needed, our current challenge is to do our best to effectively utilize new knowledge to improve care and outcomes in our communities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.13130

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asarnow, J. R., & Mehlum, L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Asarnow, Joan Rosenbaum
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-09-12
Volume
60
Issue
10
Pages
1046-1054
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2972776841
Cited by
100
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (NIMHR01, MH112147)
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA U79SM080041)
  • American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
  • American Psychological Association
  • Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
adolescent suicide, self-harm, suicide prevention, suicide risk assessment, suicide risk screening, dialectical behavior therapy, brief intervention, suicide attempt prevention, youth mental health care
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Behavior Therapy, Humans, Self-Injurious Behavior, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review