Cited by 35Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and Management

Efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for people with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Sakamoto, Ryo, Ohtake, Yoichi, Kataoka, Yuki, Matsuda, Yoshinobu, Hata, Tomokazu, Otonari, Jun, Yamane, Akira, Matsuoka, Hiromichi +1 more·2022·Journal of Diabetes Investigation

Abstract

Abstract Aims/Introduction This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Materials and Methods Several electronic databases were examined on 16 January 2021, including PubMed, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov. Randomized controlled trials were included to compare ACT with usual treatment for people with type 2 diabetes reported in any language. Primary outcome measures were glycated hemoglobin, self‐care ability assessed by the summary of diabetes self‐care activities and all adverse events. The secondary outcome measure was acceptance assessed by the acceptance and action diabetes questionnaire. Results Of 678 publications initially identified, three trials were included in the meta‐analysis. ACT resulted in a reduction in glycated hemoglobin (mean difference −0.62 points lower in the intervention group; 95% confidence interval −1.07 to −0.16; I2 = 0%; low‐quality evidence). In addition, ACT increased the score of the summary of diabetes self‐care activities (mean difference 8.48 points higher in the intervention group; 95% confidence interval 2.16–14.80; high‐quality evidence). Adverse events were not measured in all trials. ACT increased scores of the acceptance and action diabetes questionnaire (mean difference 5.98 points higher in the intervention group; 95% confidence interval, 1.42–10.54; I2 = 43%; low‐quality evidence). Conclusions ACT might reduce glycated hemoglobin, and increase self‐care ability and acceptance among people with type 2 diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jdi.13658

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A previous review found ACT reduced HbA1c by MD -0.62% (95% CI [-1.07, -0.52]).

    “which was similar to a previous review (MD: -0.62%; 95% CI [-1.07, -0.52]; Sakamoto et al., 2022).”

    From Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. (2024) · cites this paper as Sakamoto et al., 2022

    The Results (Primary outcome, HbA1c) report that ACT reduced HbA1c by an MD of −0.62, matching the cited estimate. However, the reported 95% CI is −1.07 to −0.16, not −1.07 to −0.52; Table 1 gives the same interval. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sakamoto et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review which included three studies with 678 participants and investigated short-term beneficial effects of ACT on glycemic control, self-care ability, and acceptance.

    “Sakamoto et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review which included three studies with 678 participants and investigated the short-term beneficial effects of ACT on glycemic control, self-care ability, and acceptance.”

    From Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. (2024) · cites this paper as Sakamoto et al. (2022)

    The Abstract Results report that three trials were included and that ACT improved measures of glycemic control, self-care ability, and acceptance. The Discussion describes the review as assessing short-term efficacy. However, 678 was the number of publications initially identified, not participants; Table 1 reports 232 participants for the HbA1c analysis. (LLM, conf=0.95)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A meta-analysis concluded that ACT interventions may improve the ability of self-care, psychological flexibility and HbA1c in type 2 diabetes.

    “A meta-analysis concluded that ACT interventions may improve the ability of self-care, psychological flexibility and HbA1c in type 2 diabetes.33”

    From Impact of an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy programme on HbA1c, self-management and psychosocial factors in adults with type 1 diabetes and elevated HbA1c levels: A randomised controlled trial (2023) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Results section reports lower HbA1c and higher self-care scores with ACT in people with type 2 diabetes. It also reports increased acceptance, measured by the AADQ; the Outcome measures section defines that measure as acceptance of diabetes-related thoughts, not psychological flexibility. Thus the claim’s psychological-flexibility component is not established by the reported results. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sakamoto et al. (2022) failed to discuss optimal characteristics of effective ACT interventions (content, delivery mode, dosage, and duration).

    “Most importantly, this review failed to discuss the optimal characteristics of effective ACT interventions (content, delivery mode, dosage, and duration) and, thus, further exploration is warranted.”
  • The effectiveness of ACT on psychological distress was not evaluated and reported in Sakamoto et al. (2022).

    “The effectiveness of ACT on psychological distress was not evaluated and reported.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [17]Hayes SC, Jacobson NS, Follette VM, et al. Acceptance and Change: Content and Context in Psychotherapy. Reno: Context Press, 1994.
  2. [21]The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.4. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sakamoto, R., Ohtake, Y., Kataoka, Y., Matsuda, Y., Hata, T., Otonari, J., Yamane, A., Matsuoka, H., & Yoshiuchi, K.
Affiliations
  • Kindai University (JP)
  • Sakai City Medical Center (JP)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • NHO Kinki Chuo Chest Medical Center (JP)
  • Kyushu University (JP)
  • International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital (JP)
  • Kansai Medical University Hospital (JP)
  • National Cancer Center Hospital (JP)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Sakamoto, Ryo
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-09-27
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
262-270
ISSN
  • 2040-1116 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-1124
OpenAlex
W3197906331
Cited by
35
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Investigation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, type 2 diabetes, HbA1c, diabetes self-care, acceptance, psychological intervention, adverse events, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review