Cited by 5Gastrointestinal motility and disordersPelvic floor disorders treatmentsGastroesophageal reflux and treatments

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Lubiprostone and Osmotic Laxatives in Chronic Idiopathic Constipation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis

Open access
Yang, Luoyao, Zong, Ye, Meng, Fandong, Wu, Yongdong, Zhang, Shutian·2025·Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of lubiprostone (Lub) with osmotic laxatives in the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library in May 2024. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were manually searched by two independent reviewers. The efficacy was assessed by the proportion of patients with spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) within 24 h after the first administration of the medication and SBMs in Weeks 1 and 4. Safety was evaluated based on adverse events including nausea, diarrhea, and abdominal distension. Optimal probability values and the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) were also calculated for all interventions. Higher SUCRA values indicate better efficacy and safety of the intervention. Results: Following a thorough search and screening process, 25 articles were included. Among the selected trials, 8 compared Lub to placebo, 10 compared polyethylene glycol (PEG) to placebo, 4 compared lactulose (Lac) to placebo, and 3 compared PEG to Lac. The meta‐analysis results indicated that Lub and osmotic laxatives were significantly more effective than placebo. According to the SUCRA results, the highest rank probabilities were for Lub in increasing the SBMs and reducing abdominal distension. Conclusion: Lubiprostone is more effective than PEG and Lactulose for treating CIC, with comparable safety profiles. However, this conclusion requires further validation through large‐scale, high‐quality studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgh.16844

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. E. Coss-Adame, J. M. Remes-Troche, R. Flores Rendón, J. L. Tamayo de la Cuesta, and M. A. Valdovinos Díaz, "Efficacy and Safety of Lubi- prostone for the Treatment of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation: A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study," Revista de Gastroenterolo- gia de Mexico (English) 89 (2024): 70-79.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, L., Zong, Y., Meng, F., Wu, Y., & Zhang, S.
Affiliations
Capital Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wu, Yongdong
Venue
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-12-11
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
387-397
ISSN
  • 0815-9319 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1746
OpenAlex
W4405281985
Cited by
5
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Basic Research Program of China (2023YFC2507300)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Keywords
lubiprostone, osmotic laxatives, chronic idiopathic constipation, polyethylene glycol, lactulose, spontaneous bowel movements, abdominal distension, drug efficacy, drug safety, adverse events
MeSH terms
Lubiprostone, Network Meta-Analysis as Topic, Chronic Disease, Constipation, Defecation, Humans, Lactulose, Osmosis, Polyethylene Glycols, Treatment Outcome, Laxatives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review