Cited by 24Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationTechnology Use by Older AdultsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Video‐Enhanced Care Management for Medically Complex Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment

Open access
Hastings, Susan N., Mahanna, Elizabeth P., Berkowitz, Theodore S. Z., Smith, Valerie A., Choate, Ashley L., Hughes, Jaime M., Pavon, Juliessa, Robinson, Katina +7 more·2021·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This pilot study assessed feasibility of video‐enhanced care management for complex older veterans with suspected mild cognitive impairment (CI) and their care partners, compared with telephone delivery. DESIGN: Pilot randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were enrolled as dyads, consisting of veterans aged 65 years or older with complex medical conditions (Care Assessment Need score ≥90) and suspected mild CI (education‐adjusted Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status score 20–31) and their care partners. INTERVENTION: The 12‐week care management intervention consisted of monthly calls from a study nurse covering medication management, cardiovascular disease risk reduction, physical activity, and sleep behaviors, delivered via video compared with telephone. MEASUREMENTS: Dyads completed baseline and follow‐up assessments to assess feasibility, acceptability, and usability. RESULTS: Forty veterans (mean (standard deviation (SD)) age = 72.4 (6.1) years; 100% male; 37.5% Black) and their care partners (mean (SD) age = 64.7 (10.8) years) were enrolled and randomized to telephone or video‐enhanced care management. About a third of veteran participants indicated familiarity with relevant technology (regular tablet use and/or experience with videoconferencing); 53.6% of internet users were comfortable or very comfortable using the internet. Overall, 43 (71.7%) care management calls were completed in the video arm and 52 (86.7%) were completed in the telephone arm. Usability of the video telehealth platform was rated higher for participants already familiar with technology used to deliver the intervention (mean (SD) System Usability Scale scores: 65.0 (17.0) vs 55.6 (19.6)). Veterans, care partners, and study nurses reported greater engagement, communication, and interaction in the video arm. CONCLUSION: Video‐delivered care management calls were feasible and preferred over telephone for some complex older adults with mild CI and their care partners. Future research should focus on understanding how to assess and incorporate patient and family preferences related to uptake and maintenance of video telehealth interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.16819

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]Welsh KA, Breitner JCS, Magruder-Habib KM. Detection of dementia in the elderly using the telephone interview for cognitive status. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 1993; 6(2): 103– 110.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hastings, S. N., Mahanna, E. P., Berkowitz, T. S. Z., Smith, V. A., Choate, A. L., Hughes, J. M., Pavon, J., Robinson, K., Hendrix, C., Van Houtven, C., Gentry, P., Rose, C., Plassman, B. L., Potter, G., & Oddone, E.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Durham VA Health Care System (US)
  • Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation Durham VA Health Care System Durham North Carolina USA
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-09-23
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
77-84
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W3088435317
Cited by
24
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (CIN 13–410, HX002030-01A1, PPO 15-425)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
video telehealth, care management, mild cognitive impairment, older veterans, care partners, dyadic intervention, feasibility, usability, medication management, cardiovascular disease risk reduction, physical activity, sleep behavior, technology acceptance, System Usability Scale
MeSH terms
Aged, Chronic Disease, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Care Management, Pilot Projects, Telephone, Veterans, Caregivers, Telemedicine, Risk Reduction Behavior, Videoconferencing, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review