Cited by 24Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Impact of diagnosed (vs undiagnosed) dementia on family caregiving experiences

Open access
Burgdorf, Julia G., Amjad, Halima·2023·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Background: Most older adults with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) do not receive a timely formal diagnosis, although formal diagnosis is linked to improved outcomes. Little is known about how a recognized formal diagnosis impacts family caregivers, who provide crucial support for older adults experiencing ADRD. Methods: We analyzed 2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study and linked National Study of Caregiving data for a nationally representative sample of 724 (weighted n = 5,431,551) caregivers who assisted an older adult with probable dementia. Probable dementia was determined via previously validated composite measure. We modeled caregiver experiences as a function of recognized formal ADRD diagnosis using weighted, logistic regression and adjusting for the relevant older adult and caregiver characteristics. Results: Among caregivers who assisted an older adult with probable dementia, those assisting an individual with recognized formal ADRD diagnosis were significantly more likely to report emotional difficulty (aOR: 1.77; p = 0.03) and family disagreement over the older adult's care (aOR: 5.53; p = 0.03). They were also more likely to assist with communication during doctors' visits (aOR: 9.71; p < 0.001) and to receive caregiving‐related training (aOR: 2.59; p = 0.01). Conclusions: While a timely ADRD diagnosis may help ensure access to needed supports for older adult and caregiver alike, diagnosis must be linked to support as they navigate resultant complex emotions. Formal diagnosis is linked to caregiver integration with, and support from, the older adult's team of health care providers; therefore, reducing existing disparities in timely diagnosis is necessary to ensure all caregivers have equal access to support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.18155

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caregivers who helped someone with a formal diagnosis of dementia indicated more emotional difficulty and family disagreement than caregivers of individuals without a formal diagnosis.

    “Caregivers who helped someone with a formal diagnosis of dementia indicated more emotional difficulty and family disagreement than caregivers of individuals without a formal diagnosis.”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [544]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [8]National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Health Care Services; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Committee on Care Interventions for Individuals with Dementia and Their Caregivers, Stroud C, Larson EB, eds. Meeting the Challenge of Caring for Persons Living with Dementia and Their Care Partners and Caregivers: A Way Forward. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); February 23, 2021. 33625814

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burgdorf, J. G., & Amjad, H.
Affiliations
  • VNS Health (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Burgdorf, Julia G.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-11-25
Volume
71
Issue
4
Pages
1236-1242
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W4310054756
Cited by
24
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K23 AG064036, R03 AG063237)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
dementia diagnosis, Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, family caregivers, caregiver experiences, emotional burden, caregiver education, communication with health care providers, timely diagnosis, older adults, caregiver support
MeSH terms
Psychosocial Support Systems, White, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Dementia, Family, Family Health, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Care Team, Stress, Psychological, Reproducibility of Results, Logistic Models, Treatment Outcome, Caregivers, Delayed Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review