Cited by 238Nursing care and researchIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

Multifactorial Examination of Caregiver Burden in a National Sample of Family and Unpaid Caregivers

Open access
Riffin, Catherine, Van Ness, Peter H., Wolff, Jennifer L., Fried, Terri·2019·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine factors associated with caregiver burden from a multifactorial perspective by examining caregiver and care recipient characteristics and a full range of caregiving tasks. DESIGN: Nationally representative surveys of community‐dwelling older adults and their family caregivers residing in the United States. SETTING: 2011 National Health and Aging Trends Study and National Study of Caregiving. PARTICIPANTS: Community‐dwelling older adults and their family caregivers. MEASUREMENTS: Caregiver burden, comprising emotional, physical, and financial difficulties associated with caregiving. RESULTS: An estimated 14.9 million caregivers assisted 7.6 million care recipients. More than half of caregivers reported burden related to caregiving. In a multivariable regression model, caregivers who assisted with more activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living, health management tasks, and health system logistics were more likely to experience burden, as were female caregivers, adult child caregivers, caregivers in poor health, caregivers with anxiety symptoms, and those using respite care. Dementia was the only care recipient characteristic associated with burden. CONCLUSION: Caregiver characteristics and provision of caregiving tasks determine caregiver burden more than care recipient characteristics. Absence of an association between type of a care recipient's chronic conditions and burden, except for dementia, suggests that the tasks that caregivers who assist older adults with a variety of health conditions undertake shape the experience of caregiving. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:277–283, 2019.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.15664

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The spillover costs of MDD to adults living with individuals with MDD may be due to household members (e.g., adult children or spouse) tending to be primary caregivers for those with mental health conditions.

    “The spillover costs of MDD to adults living with individuals with MDD may be due to a variety of reasons, including the fact that household members (e.g., adult children or spouse) tend to be primary caregivers for those with mental health conditions [35,36].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [3]Committee on Family Caregiving for Older Adults, Board on Health Care Services, Health and Medicine Division, & National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine Families Caring for an Aging America. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine, 2016. 27905704
  2. [25]Wolff JL, Spillman BC, Freedman VA A national profile of family and unpaid caregivers who assist older adults with health care activities. JAMA IM. 2016; 176(3): 372– 379. PMC4802361 26882031
  3. [42]Revenson TA, Griva K, Luszczynska A Interventions to support caregivers Caregiving in the illness context. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riffin, C., Van Ness, P. H., Wolff, J. L., & Fried, T.
Affiliations
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Department of Internal Medicine School of Medicine, Yale University New Haven Connecticut
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Riffin, Catherine
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-11-19
Volume
67
Issue
2
Pages
277-283
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2900745305
Cited by
238
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 4
FWCI
26.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P30AG021342T32AG1934, U01 AG032947, T32AG1934)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
caregiver burden, family caregivers, informal caregivers, older adults, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, dementia, respite care, caregiver health, anxiety symptoms, adult child caregivers, gender differences in caregiving
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Regression Analysis, United States, Caregivers, Cost of Illness, Adult Children, Compensation and Redress, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review