Cited by 116Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeNursing care and research

The cost-effectiveness of a behavior intervention with caregivers of patients with Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Nichols, Linda O., Chang, Cyril, Lummus, Allan, Burns, Robert, Martindale‐Adams, Jennifer, Graney, Marshall J., Coon, David W., Czaja, Sara +1 more·2008·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the cost-effectiveness of a randomized, clinical trial of a home-based intervention for caregivers of people with dementia. DESIGN: This cost-effectiveness analysis examined Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregivers Health (REACH II), a multisite, randomized, clinical trial, from June 2002 through December 2004, funded by the National Institute on Aging and the National Institute of Nursing Research, of a behavioral intervention to decrease caregivers' stress and improve management of care recipient behavioral problems. SETTING: Community-dwelling dementia caregiving dyads from the Memphis REACH II site. PARTICIPANTS: Of Memphis' random sample of 55 intervention and 57 control black and white dyads, 46 in each arm completed without death or discontinuation. Family caregivers were aged 21 and older, lived with the care recipient, and had provided 4 or more hours of care per day for 6 months or longer. Care recipients were cognitively and functionally impaired. INTERVENTION(S): Twelve individual sessions (9 home sessions and 3 telephone sessions) supplemented by five telephone support-group sessions. Control caregivers received two "check in" phone calls. MEASUREMENTS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), the additional cost to bring about one additional unit of benefit (hours per day of providing care). RESULTS: At 6 months, there was a significant difference between intervention caregivers and control caregivers in hours providing care (P=.01). The ICER showed that intervention caregivers had 1 extra hour per day not spent in caregiving, at a cost of $5 per day. CONCLUSION: The intervention provided that most scarce of caregiver commodities--time. The emotional and physical costs of dementia caregiving are enormous, and this intervention was able to alleviate some of that cost.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01569.x

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Hall G, Buckwalter K, Stolley J et al. Standardized care plan: Managing Alz- heimer patients at home. J Gerontol Nurs 1995;21:37-47.
  2. Belle S, Burgio L, Burns R et al. for the REACH II Investigators. Enhancing the quality of life of Hispanic/Latino, Black/African American, and White/Cau- casian dementia caregivers: The REACH II randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:727-738.
  3. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW et al. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963;185:914-919.
  4. Drummond M, O'Brien B, Stoddart G et al. Methods for the Economic Eval- uation of Health Care Programs. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2001.
  5. Fleurence R. Cost-effectiveness of fracture prevention treatment and the elderly. Int J Tech Assoc Health Care 2004;20:184-191.
  6. Mahoney D, Jones R, Coon D et al. Caregiver vigilanceFinstrumentation and use with Alzheimer's family caregivers. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Dement 2003; 18, 39-48.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nichols, L. O., Chang, C., Lummus, A., Burns, R., Martindale‐Adams, J., Graney, M. J., Coon, D. W., Czaja, S., & for the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregivers Health II Investigators
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Nichols, Linda O.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12-27
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
413-420
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1572827656
Cited by
116
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Office of Research and Development
  • National Institute on Aging (U01AG013313, U01AG020274, U01-AG13313)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (AG13313)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, dementia caregiving, family caregivers, caregiver stress, behavioral symptoms of dementia, home-based intervention, cost-effectiveness, caregiver time
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Health Education, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Program Evaluation, Health Behavior, Treatment Outcome, Caregivers, Health Care Costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review