Cited by 155Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsObesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health Practices

A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions for weight management using text messaging

Open access
Siopis, G., Chey, T., Allman‐Farinelli, M.·2015·Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity prevalence continues to increase worldwide, with significant associated chronic disease and health cost implications. Among more recent innovations in health service provision is the use of text messaging for health behaviour change interventions including weight management. This review investigates the efficacy of weight management programmes incorporating text messaging. METHODS: Medical and scientific databases were searched from January 1993 to October 2013. Eligibility criteria included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), pseudoRCTs and before and after studies of weight management, among healthy children and adults, that used text messaging and included a nutrition component. Data extraction and quality assessment followed guidelines from PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) and the Evidence Analysis Manual of the American Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. RESULTS: From 512 manuscripts retrieved, 14 met the inclusion criteria (five manuscripts in children and nine in adults). Duration of interventions ranged from 1 to 24 months. Frequency of text messaging was from daily to fortnightly. Six studies in adults were included in a meta-analysis with mean body weight change as the primary outcome. The weighted mean change in body weight in intervention participants was -2.56 kg (95% confidence interval = -3.46 to -1.65) and in controls -0.37 kg (95% confidence interval = -1.22 to 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: The small body of evidence indicates that text messaging interventions can promote weight loss. However, lack of long-term results indicate that further efficacy studies are required. Future investigations should elucidate the determinants, such as intervention duration, text message frequency and level of interactivity that maximise the success and cost effectiveness of the delivery medium.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jhn.12207

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siopis, G., Chey, T., & Allman‐Farinelli, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • School of Molecular Bioscience The University of Sydney Sydney NSW Australia
Venue
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-31
Volume
28
Issue
s2
Pages
1-15
ISSN
  • 0952-3871 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-277X
OpenAlex
W2131885226
Cited by
155
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
text messaging, weight management, weight loss, obesity, mobile health, nutrition interventions, health behavior change, children, adults, weight change
MeSH terms
Health Promotion, Humans, Obesity, Weight Loss, Health Behavior, Cell Phone, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review