Cited by 40Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesPharmacology and Obesity TreatmentObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Filling the intervention gap: service evaluation of an intensive nonsurgical weight management programme for severe and complex obesity

Open access
McCombie, L., Brosnahan, N., Ross, H., Bell‐Higgs, A., Govan, L., Lean, M. E. J.·2019·Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

Background: Weight management including formula total diet replacement (TDR) is emerging as an effective intervention for severe and complex obesity, particularly with respect to type 2 diabetes (T2 DM). However, no prospective audit and service evaluation of such programmes have been reported. Methods: Following initial feasibility piloting, the Counterweight‐Plus programme was commissioned across a variety of healthcare providers. The programme includes: Screening, TDR (formula low energy diet), food reintroduction and weight loss maintenance, all delivered by staff with 8 h of training, in‐service mentoring, ongoing specialist support and access to medical consultant expertise. Anonymised data are returned centrally for clinical evaluation. Results: Up to December 2016, 288 patients commenced the programme. Mean (SD) baseline characteristics were: age 47.5 (12.7) years, weight 128.0 (32.0) kg, body mass index 45.7 (10.1) kg m−2, n = 76 (26.5%) were male and n = 99 (34.5%) had T2 DM. On an intention‐to‐treat (ITT) basis, a loss of ≥15 kg at 12 months was achieved by 48 patients, representing 22.1% of all who started and 40% of those who maintained engagement. For complete cases, mean (95% confidence interval) weight loss was 13.3 (12.1–14.4) kg at 3 months, 16.0 (14.4–17.6) kg at 6 months and 14.2 (12.1–16.3) kg at 12 months (all P < 0.001), with losses to follow‐up of 10.8%, 29.3% and 44.2%, respectively. Mean loss at 12 months by ITT analyses was: single imputation –10.5 (9.5) kg, last observation carried forward –10.9 (11.6) kg and baseline observation carried forward –7.9 (11.1) kg. The presence of diabetes had no significant impact on weight change outcomes. Conclusions: This nonsurgical approach is effective for many individuals with severe and complex obesity, representing an option before considering surgery. The results are equally effective in terms of weight loss for people with T2 DM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jhn.12611

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 12-month intervention cost is under half of the average annual UK healthcare cost of a person with type 2 diabetes.

    “The 12-month intervention cost is under half of the average annual UK healthcare cost of a person with type 2 diabetes. 23”

    From Durability of a primary care-led weight-management intervention for remission of type 2 diabetes: 2-year results of the DiRECT open-label, cluster-randomised trial (2019) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Discussion (p. 11) mentions potential savings on diabetes medications, and the Results (p. 9) report 12-month weight outcomes. Neither gives a 12-month intervention cost or an average annual UK healthcare cost for a person with type 2 diabetes; searches for those costs and the claimed comparison found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]10. Commission Directive 96/8/EC. The Foods Intended for Use in Energy RestrictedDiets 431 for Weight Reduction Regulations 1997. Official Journal of European Communities. February 432 1996. 433 434 435 436
  2. [17]17. Anderson JW, Cyril WC, Kendall CWC, et al. Importance of weight management in type 2 diabetes. J Am Coll Nutr 2003; 22: 331-339.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCombie, L., Brosnahan, N., Ross, H., Bell‐Higgs, A., Govan, L., & Lean, M. E. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Counterweight Ltd London UK
  • Phastar Statistical Consultancy Chiswick, London UK
Corresponding author
McCombie, L.
Venue
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-11-22
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
329-337
ISSN
  • 0952-3871 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-277X
OpenAlex
W2904363567
Cited by
40
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
morbid obesity, total diet replacement, weight management, type 2 diabetes, weight loss, weight loss maintenance, food reintroduction, non-surgical obesity treatment
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Audit, Middle Aged, Obesity, Scotland, Program Evaluation, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Caloric Restriction, Weight Reduction Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review