The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alzheimer’s protection effect of A673T mutation may be driven by lower Aβ oligomer binding affinity
Abstract
Several mutations conferring protection against Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been described, none as profound as the A673T mutation, where carriers are four times less likely to get AD compared to noncarriers. This mutation results in reduced amyloid beta (Aβ) protein production in vitro and lower lifetime Aβ concentration in carriers. Better understanding of the protective mechanisms of the mutation may provide important insights into AD pathophysiology and identify productive therapeutic intervention strategies for disease modification. Aβ(1‐42) protein forms oligomers that bind saturably to a single receptor site on neuronal synapses, initiating the downstream toxicities observed in AD. Decreased formation, toxicity, or stability of soluble Aβ oligomers, or reduction of synaptic binding of these oligomers, may combine with overall lower Aβ concentration to underlie A673T’s disease protecting mechanism. To investigate these possibilities, we compared the formation rate of soluble oligomers made from Icelandic A673T mutant and wild type (wt) Aβ(1‐42) synthetic protein, the amount and intensity of oligomer bound to mature primary rat hippocampal/cortical neuronal synapses, and the potency of bound oligomers to impact trafficking rate in neurons in vitro using a physiologically relevant oligomer preparation method. At equal protein concentrations, mutant protein forms approximately 50% or fewer oligomers of high molecular weight (>50 kDa) compared to wt protein. Mutant oligomers are twice as potent at altering the cellular vesicle trafficking rate as wt at equivalent concentrations, however, mutant oligomers have a >4‐fold lower binding affinity to synaptic receptors (Kd = 1,950 vs. 442 nM). The net effect of these differences is a lower overall toxicity at a given concentration. This study demonstrates for the first time that mutant A673T Aβ oligomers prepared with this method have fundamentally different assembly characteristics and biological impact from wt protein and indicates that its disease protecting mechanism may result primarily from the mutant protein's much lower binding affinity to synaptic receptors. This suggests that therapeutics that effectively reduce oligomer binding to synapses in the brain may be beneficial in AD. image
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CT1812 phenocopies the protective A673T mutation in amyloid precursor protein by reducing the binding of toxic β-amyloid oligomers to synapses.
“Interestingly, CT1812 phenocopies the protective A673T mutation in amyloid precursor protein, in that CT1812 reduces the binding of toxic β-amyloid oligomers to synapses, just as the A673T mutation amyloid-β oligomers demonstrate a four-fold reduction in binding compared with wild-type amyloid precursor protein [158].”
From Sigma-2 Receptors—From Basic Biology to Therapeutic Target: A Focus on Age-Related Degenerative Diseases (2023) · cites this paper as [158]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED ARTICLE: A specific amyloid-β protein assembly in the brain impairs memory
Lesné, S., Koh, M. T., Kotilinek, L., Kayed, R., Glabe, C. G., Yang, A., Gallagher, M., & Ashe, K. H. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04533 · Cited by 2,769 · cited 1×
“…mutations either increase the total amount of Aβ or the relative proportion of the longer Aβ(1-42) form of the protein, the major species deposited in amyloid plaques in AD (Esler & Wolfe, 2001; Glabe, 2008; Hardy, 2017; Jonsson et al., 2012; Lesné et al., 2006; Selkoe, 2001; Stenh et al., 2002).”
BackgroundRetractedFaul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971
Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies
Long, J. M., & Holtzman, D. M. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.001 · Cited by 3,204
A mutation in APP protects against Alzheimer’s disease and age-related cognitive decline
Jonsson, T., Atwal, J. K., Steinberg, S., Snaedal, J., Jonsson, P. V., Bjornsson, S., Stefansson, H., Sulem, P., Gudbjartsson, D., Maloney, J., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11283 · Cited by 1,738
Phase 3 Trials of Solanezumab for Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
Doody, R. S., Thomas, R. G., Farlow, M., Iwatsubo, T., Vellas, B., Joffe, S., Kieburtz, K., Raman, R., Sun, X., Aisen, P. S., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1312889 · Cited by 1,668
Cellular prion protein mediates impairment of synaptic plasticity by amyloid-β oligomers
Laurén, J., Gimbel, D. A., Nygaard, H. B., Gilbert, J. W., & Strittmatter, S. M. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07761 · Cited by 1,560
Trial of Solanezumab for Mild Dementia Due to Alzheimer’s Disease
Honig, L. S., Vellas, B., Woodward, M., Boada, M., Bullock, R., Borrie, M., Hager, K., Andreasen, N., Scarpini, E., Liu-Seifert, H., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1705971 · Cited by 1,049 · cited 1×
“Monoclonal antibodies with high affinity for monomer, such as solanezumab, have not been clinically efficacious (Doody et al., 2014; Honig et al., 2018).”
BackgroundThe Amyloid-β Oligomer Hypothesis: Beginning of the Third Decade
Cline, E. N., Bicca, M. A., Viola, K. L., & Klein, W. L. (2018) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-179941 · Cited by 870
Structural Classification of Toxic Amyloid Oligomers
Glabe, C. G. (2008) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.r800016200 · Cited by 783
Amyloid β oligomers in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis, treatment, and diagnosis
Viola, K. L., & Klein, W. L. (2015) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-015-1386-3 · Cited by 628
Vaccination with soluble Aβ oligomers generates toxicity‐neutralizing antibodies
Lambert, M. P., Viola, K. L., Chromy, B. A., Chang, L., Morgan, T. E., Yu, J., Venton, D. L., Krafft, G. A., Finch, C. E., & Klein, W. L. (2001) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00592.x · Cited by 349
Amyloid β-protein oligomers and Alzheimer’s disease
Hayden, E. Y., & Teplow, D. B. (2013) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/alzrt226 · Cited by 276
Goure, W. F., Krafft, G. A., Jerecic, J., & Hefti, F. (2014) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/alzrt272 · Cited by 190
Izzo, N. J., Staniszewski, A., To, L., Fa, M., Teich, A. F., Saeed, F., Wostein, H., Walko, T., Vaswani, A., Wardius, M., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111898 · Cited by 180
Self-citationDecreased plasma β‐amyloid in the Alzheimer's disease APP A 673 Tvariant carriers
Martiskainen, H., Herukka, S., Stančáková, A., Paananen, J., Soininen, H., Kuusisto, J., Laakso, M., & Hiltunen, M. (2017) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24969 · Cited by 64
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 65
- Aisen P. S., 2020, The future of anti‐amyloid trials, The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease, 7, 146
- 10.5114/aoms.2011.20612 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s40142-019-0156-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.05.003 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M114.599027 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.10.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpc.2017.05.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.12.013 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1064638 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ana.23748 · DOI
- Hardy J., 2017, The discovery of alzheimer causing mutations in the APP gene and the formulation of the “Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis”, FEBS Journal, 38, 42
- 10.1038/nrg4017 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi9904149 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.10.093 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0111899 · DOI · Paper page
- Izzo N. J., 2020, Preclinical and clinical biomarker studies of CT1812: A novel approach to Alzheimer’s disease modification, Science Translational Medicine
- 10.1038/nprot.2010.72 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0133272 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.09.017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1242077 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M116.744722 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00045 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0197-0186(02)00050-5 · DOI
- 10.1186/1750-1326-6-63 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10571-010-9528-6 · DOI
- Leigh C., 2017, A variant in PPP4R3A protects against alzheimer‐related metabolic decline, Annals of Neurology, 118, 6072
- 10.1016/j.ab.2004.08.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ab.2006.04.036 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.08.002 · DOI
- Lin T. W., 2017, Alzheimer’s amyloid‐β A2T variant and its Nterminal peptides inhibit amyloid‐β fibrillization and rescue the induced cytotoxicity, PLoS One, 12, 1
- 10.1007/s00401-006-0077-5 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.69062285.x · DOI
- 10.1186/s13195-016-0181-2 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M114.589069 · DOI
- Mohamed A., 2011, Aβ internalization by neurons and glia, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 2011, 127984, 10.4061/2011/127984 · DOI
- 10.3233/JAD-2010-1221 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.24995 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41582-018-0116-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2174/156720507783018235 · DOI
- 10.1002/jnr.23507 · DOI
- 10.1002/hipo.22503 · DOI
- 10.7717/peerj.73 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2912-14.2015 · DOI
- 10.1021/cn500156r · DOI
- 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.741 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.15252/emmm.201606210 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature19323 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nm1782 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00412 · DOI
- 10.1101/cshperspect.a024075 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/chem.201703440 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001756-200210280-00005 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0076-6879(06)13002-5 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi990718v · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01306.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0408153101 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.trci.2017.10.001 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04426.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.conb.2020.02.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-385883-2.00012-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.005 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1698-16.2016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1084/jem.20151428 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.02.003 · DOI
- 10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00171 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lizama, B. N., Kahle, J., Catalano, S. M., Caggiano, A. O., Grundman, M., & Hamby, M. E. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24076251 · Cited by 54
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Limegrover, C. S., LeVine, H., Izzo, N. J., Yurko, R., Mozzoni, K., Rehak, C., Sadlek, K., Safferstein, H., & Catalano, S. M.
- Affiliations
- From Cognition Therapeutics Inc Pittsburgh PA USA
- Sanders‐Brown Center on Aging University of Kentucky Lexington KY USA
- Venue
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-10-25
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1316-1330
- ISSN
- 0022-3042
- 1471-4159
- PMC
- PMC8246829
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 15
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation (20100501)
- National Institute on Aging (AG037337, AG047059, AG052249, AG052252, AG055206, AG055247, AG06212)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS080576, 20100501, NS083175)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review