Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Alzheimer’s protection effect of A673T mutation may be driven by lower Aβ oligomer binding affinity

Limegrover, Colleen S., LeVine, Harry, Izzo, Nicholas J., Yurko, Raymond, Mozzoni, Kelsie, Rehak, Courtney, Sadlek, Kelsey, Safferstein, Hank, Catalano, Susan M.·2021·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

Several mutations conferring protection against Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been described, none as profound as the A673T mutation, where carriers are four times less likely to get AD compared to noncarriers. This mutation results in reduced amyloid beta (Aβ) protein production in vitro and lower lifetime Aβ concentration in carriers. Better understanding of the protective mechanisms of the mutation may provide important insights into AD pathophysiology and identify productive therapeutic intervention strategies for disease modification. Aβ(1‐42) protein forms oligomers that bind saturably to a single receptor site on neuronal synapses, initiating the downstream toxicities observed in AD. Decreased formation, toxicity, or stability of soluble Aβ oligomers, or reduction of synaptic binding of these oligomers, may combine with overall lower Aβ concentration to underlie A673T’s disease protecting mechanism. To investigate these possibilities, we compared the formation rate of soluble oligomers made from Icelandic A673T mutant and wild type (wt) Aβ(1‐42) synthetic protein, the amount and intensity of oligomer bound to mature primary rat hippocampal/cortical neuronal synapses, and the potency of bound oligomers to impact trafficking rate in neurons in vitro using a physiologically relevant oligomer preparation method. At equal protein concentrations, mutant protein forms approximately 50% or fewer oligomers of high molecular weight (>50 kDa) compared to wt protein. Mutant oligomers are twice as potent at altering the cellular vesicle trafficking rate as wt at equivalent concentrations, however, mutant oligomers have a >4‐fold lower binding affinity to synaptic receptors (Kd = 1,950 vs. 442 nM). The net effect of these differences is a lower overall toxicity at a given concentration. This study demonstrates for the first time that mutant A673T Aβ oligomers prepared with this method have fundamentally different assembly characteristics and biological impact from wt protein and indicates that its disease protecting mechanism may result primarily from the mutant protein's much lower binding affinity to synaptic receptors. This suggests that therapeutics that effectively reduce oligomer binding to synapses in the brain may be beneficial in AD. image

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jnc.15212

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CT1812 phenocopies the protective A673T mutation in amyloid precursor protein by reducing the binding of toxic β-amyloid oligomers to synapses.

    “Interestingly, CT1812 phenocopies the protective A673T mutation in amyloid precursor protein, in that CT1812 reduces the binding of toxic β-amyloid oligomers to synapses, just as the A673T mutation amyloid-β oligomers demonstrate a four-fold reduction in binding compared with wild-type amyloid precursor protein [158].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. Aisen P. S., 2020, The future of anti‐amyloid trials, The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease, 7, 146
  2. 10.5114/aoms.2011.20612 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1007/s40142-019-0156-2 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.05.003 · DOI
  5. 10.1074/jbc.M114.599027 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.10.011 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.bpc.2017.05.001 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.12.013 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.1064638 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1002/ana.23748 · DOI
  11. Hardy J., 2017, The discovery of alzheimer causing mutations in the APP gene and the formulation of the “Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis”, FEBS Journal, 38, 42
  12. 10.1038/nrg4017 · DOI
  13. 10.1021/bi9904149 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.10.093 · DOI
  15. 10.1371/journal.pone.0111899 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Izzo N. J., 2020, Preclinical and clinical biomarker studies of CT1812: A novel approach to Alzheimer’s disease modification, Science Translational Medicine
  17. 10.1038/nprot.2010.72 · DOI
  18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0133272 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.09.017 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1126/science.1242077 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1074/jbc.M116.744722 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00045 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0197-0186(02)00050-5 · DOI
  24. 10.1186/1750-1326-6-63 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s10571-010-9528-6 · DOI
  26. Leigh C., 2017, A variant in PPP4R3A protects against alzheimer‐related metabolic decline, Annals of Neurology, 118, 6072
  27. 10.1016/j.ab.2004.08.014 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.ab.2006.04.036 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.08.002 · DOI
  30. Lin T. W., 2017, Alzheimer’s amyloid‐β A2T variant and its Nterminal peptides inhibit amyloid‐β fibrillization and rescue the induced cytotoxicity, PLoS One, 12, 1
  31. 10.1007/s00401-006-0077-5 · DOI
  32. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.69062285.x · DOI
  33. 10.1186/s13195-016-0181-2 · DOI
  34. 10.1074/jbc.M114.589069 · DOI
  35. Mohamed A., 2011, Aβ internalization by neurons and glia, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 2011, 127984, 10.4061/2011/127984 · DOI
  36. 10.3233/JAD-2010-1221 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1002/prot.24995 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/s41582-018-0116-6 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.2174/156720507783018235 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/jnr.23507 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/hipo.22503 · DOI
  42. 10.7717/peerj.73 · DOI
  43. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2912-14.2015 · DOI
  44. 10.1021/cn500156r · DOI
  45. 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.741 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.15252/emmm.201606210 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1038/nature19323 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1038/nm1782 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00412 · DOI
  50. 10.1101/cshperspect.a024075 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1002/chem.201703440 · DOI
  52. 10.1097/00001756-200210280-00005 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/S0076-6879(06)13002-5 · DOI
  54. 10.1021/bi990718v · DOI
  55. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01306.x · DOI
  56. 10.1073/pnas.0408153101 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.trci.2017.10.001 · DOI
  58. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04426.x · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1016/j.conb.2020.02.003 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/B978-0-12-385883-2.00012-6 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.005 · DOI
  62. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1698-16.2016 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1084/jem.20151428 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.02.003 · DOI
  65. 10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00171 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Limegrover, C. S., LeVine, H., Izzo, N. J., Yurko, R., Mozzoni, K., Rehak, C., Sadlek, K., Safferstein, H., & Catalano, S. M.
Affiliations
  • From Cognition Therapeutics Inc Pittsburgh PA USA
  • Sanders‐Brown Center on Aging University of Kentucky Lexington KY USA
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-10-25
Volume
157
Issue
4
Pages
1316-1330
ISSN
  • 0022-3042
  • 1471-4159
Cited by
24
References
15
Language
en
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation (20100501)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG037337, AG047059, AG052249, AG052252, AG055206, AG055247, AG06212)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS080576, 20100501, NS083175)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review