Cited by 16Acne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsDermatologic Treatments and ResearchPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies

Acne treatment efficacy of intense pulsed light photodynamic therapy with topical licochalcone A, l‐carnitine, and decanediol: A spilt‐face, double‐blind, randomized controlled trial

Wanitphakdeedecha, Rungsima, Tavechodperathum, Nudpanuda, Tantrapornpong, Ploypailin, Suphatsathienkul, Panittra, Techapichetvanich, Thanya, Eimpunth, Sasima, Manuskiatti, Woraphong·2020·Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology

Abstract

Background: Depending on disease severity, standard acne treatments can vary from topical to systemic therapy. However, poor compliance caused by adverse events and antibiotic resistance is a major cause of treatment failure. Aims: To determine the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with intense pulsed light (IPL) in the treatment of acne when combined with a cream containing licochalcone A, L‐carnitine and decanediol (so‐called, ‘active formulation’) versus PDT alone. Patients/Methods: Twenty‐nine volunteers, aged 21‐39 years (26 women and 3 men, mean age 29.41 ± 5.24 years), with mild to severe facial acne, were enrolled. Each subject’s face sides were randomized in a split‐face manner to either receive PDT (IPL with a 400‐720 nm cut‐off filter, at 4 sessions with two‐week intervals) combined with the active formulation cream twice daily for 10 weeks on one face side; or PDT and the vehicle cream on the other side, with the same treatment protocol. Reduction in acne quantity, melanin index and erythema index were assessed 2 weeks after the second treatment (day 28), 1 week after the fourth treatment (day 49), and 1 month after the fourth treatment (day 70). Results: Compared to baseline, patients in the active formulation group demonstrated a faster onset of reduction in the number of lesions at 2 weeks after the second treatment (p=0.010 for inflammatory acne and p=0.001 for non‐inflammatory acne). A significantly greater reduction in lesion count was observed in the active formulation group compared with the vehicle group at all timepoints of evaluation for noninflammatory acne (day 28, day 49, and day 70; p=0.003, 0.005 and 0.002 respectively), and at 1 month after the fourth treatment for inflammatory acne (p=0.036). Compared to the vehicle group, the melanin index of the active formulation group decreased significantly at 1 month after the fourth treatment (p=0.015). Conclusion: PDT is more effective in treating acne when combined with a topical cream containing licochalcone A, L‐carnitine and decanediol, than PDT alone. Significant acne reduction and improvements in post‐inflammatory hyperpigmentation were observed, which offers acne patients a better therapeutic option. It is a safe and effective combination treatment for patients with moderate and severe acne

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jocd.13178

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wanitphakdeedecha et al. reported a significant improvement in melanin index in patients treated with a moisturizer plus four sessions of PDT in a randomized, split-face study.

    “Additionally, Wanitphakdeedecha et al. reported a significant improvement in melanin index in patients treated with a moisturizer plus four sessions of PDT in a randomized, split‐face study. 59”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wanitphakdeedecha, R., Tavechodperathum, N., Tantrapornpong, P., Suphatsathienkul, P., Techapichetvanich, T., Eimpunth, S., & Manuskiatti, W.
Affiliations
Siriraj Hospital (TH)
Corresponding author
Wanitphakdeedecha, Rungsima
Venue
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-10-06
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
78-87
ISSN
  • 1473-2130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-2165
OpenAlex
W2977741470
Cited by
16
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Keywords
acne, intense pulsed light, photodynamic therapy, licochalcone A, L-carnitine, topical cream, combination therapy, acne lesion count, melanin index, erythema index, facial acne, inflammatory acne, medication adherence, antibiotic resistance, photoprotection, skin pigmentation, erythema
MeSH terms
Acne Vulgaris, Adult, Carnitine, Double-Blind Method, Face, Fatty Alcohols, Female, Humans, Male, Photochemotherapy, Treatment Outcome, Chalcones, Young Adult, Skin Cream

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review