The DOI matches its Crossref record; 117 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Pollution Premium
Open accessAbstract
This paper studies the asset pricing implications of industrial pollution. A long‐short portfolio constructed from firms with high versus low toxic emission intensity within an industry generates an average annual return of 4.42%, which remains significant after controlling for risk factors. This pollution premium cannot be explained by existing systematic risks, investor preferences, market sentiment, political connections, or corporate governance. We propose and model a new systematic risk related to environmental policy uncertainty. We use the growth in environmental litigation penalties to measure regime change risk and find that it helps price the cross section of emission portfolios' returns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(93)90023-5 · Cited by 25,754
On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance
Carhart, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x · Cited by 17,283
Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913610 · Cited by 16,936
Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests
Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. D. (1973) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260061 · Cited by 14,258
Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty*
Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjw024 · Cited by 12,458
A five-factor asset pricing model
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010 · Cited by 7,852
Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation
Hodrick, R. J., & Prescott, E. C. (1997) · Journal of Money, Credit and Banking · doi:10.2307/2953682 · Cited by 7,349
Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies
FAMA, E. F., & FRENCH, K. R. (1996) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05202.x · Cited by 6,700
Corporate Governance and Equity Prices
Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/00335530360535162 · Cited by 6,120
The Impact of Uncertainty Shocks
(2009) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta6248 · Cited by 5,834
Cited by
The Importance of Climate Risks for Institutional Investors
Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2020) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhz137 · Cited by 3,034
Ilhan, E., Sautner, Z., & Vilkov, G. (2021) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhaa071 · Cited by 1,136
Ilhan, E., Sautner, Z., & Vilkov, G. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3204420 · Cited by 1,136
The impact of climate change on the cost of bank loans
Javadi, S., & Masum, A.-A. (2021) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.102019 · Cited by 594
Dissecting climate risks: Are they reflected in stock prices?
Faccini, R., Matin, R., & Skiadopoulos, G. (2023) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.106948 · Cited by 445
Metadata
- Authors
- HSU, P., LI, K., & TSOU, C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Finance
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-04-10
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1343-1392
- ISSN
- 0022-1082 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6261
- OpenAlex
- W4322490023
- Cited by
- 658
- References
- 117
- FWCI
- 33.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Pollution Premium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jofi.13217
- The paper
- HSU, P., LI, K., & TSOU, C. (2023). The Pollution Premium. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13217
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.