Cited by 204Hormonal and reproductive studiesDoping in SportsPharmacological Effects and Assays

Health consequences of androgenic anabolic steroid use

Open access
Horwitz, H., Andersen, J. T., Dalhoff, K. P.·2019·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The lifetime prevalence of androgenic anabolic steroid abuse is estimated to be around 6% for men, but there is limited knowledge about the side effects of these drugs. OBJECTIVE: To investigate mortality and morbidity amongst users of androgenic anabolic steroids (AAS). METHODS: In this retrospective matched cohort study, 545 male subjects tested positive for AAS in Danish fitness centres during the period 3 January 2006 to 1 March 2018. Subjects were matched with 5450 male controls. In addition, 644 men who were sanctioned because they refused to submit to a doping test and 6440 controls were included as a replication cohort. RESULTS: Mortality was three times higher amongst users of AAS than amongst nonuser controls (hazard ratio 3.0, 95% CI 1.3-7.0). The median annual number of hospital contacts was 0.81 in the cohort of AAS users and 0.36 in the control cohort (P < 0.0001). Acne, gynaecomastia and erectile dysfunction affected more than 10% of the androgenic anabolic steroid users, and the prevalence of these disorders was significantly higher than in the control group (P < 0.0001). The results could be replicated in a similar cohort. CONCLUSION: Androgenic anabolic steroid users have an increased risk of dying and significantly more hospital admissions than their nonuser peers. Side effects of AAS and their metabolites were highly prevalent. Given the high rate of androgenic anabolic steroid abuse, these side effects are of public health concern.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joim.12850

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After viewing fitspiration content, men are more likely to engage in excessive exercise and to take anabolic steroids with potential negative health outcomes.

    “After viewing such content, men are more likely to engage in excessive exercise and to take anabolic steroids with potential negative health outcomes (Cafri et al., 2006; Horwitz et al., 2019; Mossman and Pacey, 2019; Tiggemann and Anderberg, 2020).”

    From The degree to which the cultural ideal is internalized predicts judgments of male and female physical attractiveness (2022) · cites this paper as Horwitz et al., 2019

    The Abstract and Discussion report adverse health outcomes among male anabolic-steroid users, including higher mortality and more hospital admissions than controls. The paper does not establish that viewing fitspiration content makes men more likely to exercise excessively or take steroids; it studied health outcomes among users identified through fitness-centre doping tests. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horwitz, H., Andersen, J. T., & Dalhoff, K. P.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Horwitz, H.
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-11-20
Volume
285
Issue
3
Pages
333-340
ISSN
  • 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2796
OpenAlex
W2901670312
Cited by
204
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Anti Doping Denmark
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
Keywords
anabolic steroids, anabolic steroid abuse, mortality, morbidity, hospitalization, acne, gynecomastia, erectile dysfunction, doping sanctions, health effects
MeSH terms
Acne Vulgaris, Adult, Atrial Fibrillation, Denmark, Gynecomastia, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Infertility, Male, Male, Mortality, Cardiomyopathies, Retrospective Studies, Thromboembolism, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, Anabolic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review