Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coffee intake protects against symptomatic gallstone disease in the general population: a Mendelian randomization study

Nordestgaard, A. T., Stender, S., Nordestgaard, B. G., Tybjærg‐Hansen, A.·2020·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background and objectives: Coffee intake is associated with low risk of symptomatic gallstone disease (GSD). We tested the hypothesis that high coffee intake causally protects against symptomatic GSD using a Mendelian randomization design. Methods: First, we tested whether high coffee intake was associated with low risk of GSD in 104 493 individuals from the general population. Mean follow‐up was 8 years (range: <1–13 years). Secondly, we tested whether two genetic variants near CYP 1A1/A2 (rs2472297) and AHR (rs4410790), combined as an allele score, were associated with higher coffee intake measured as a continuous variable. Thirdly, we tested whether the allele score was associated with lower risk of GSD in 114 220 individuals including 7294 gallstone events. Mean follow‐up was 38 years (range: <1–40 years). Results: In observational analysis, those with coffee intake of >6 cups daily had 23% lower risk of GSD compared to individuals without coffee intake [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.61–0.94)]. In genetic analysis, there was a stepwise higher coffee intake of up to 41% (caffeine per day) in individuals with 4 (highest) versus 0 (lowest) coffee intake alleles (P for trend = 3 x 10−178) and a corresponding stepwise lower risk of GSD up to 19%[HR = 0.81 (0.69–0.96)]. The estimated observational odds ratio for GSD for a one cup per day higher coffee intake was 0.97 (0.96–0.98), equal to 3% lower risk. The corresponding genetic odds ratio was 0.89 (0.83–0.95), equal to 11% lower risk. Conclusion: High coffee intake is associated observationally with low risk of GSD, and with genetic evidence to support a causal relationship.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joim.12970

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.029 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1001/jama.281.22.2106 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1053/gast.2002.37054 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/apt.13328 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32832fcdf0 · DOI
  6. Berg EH, 2017, Prevalence and determinants of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease in lifelines: a large Dutch population cohort, PLoS ONE, 12, e0171502, 10.1371/journal.pone.0171502 · DOI
  7. 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.11.039 · DOI
  8. Nordestgaard AT, 2016, Coffee intake, cardiovascular disease and all‐cause mortality: observational and Mendelian randomization analyses in 95 000‐223 000 individuals, Int J Epidemiol, 45, 1938
  9. 10.1002/sim.3034 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1093/ije/dyg070 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/mp.2014.107 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/mp.2011.101 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/hmg/ddr086 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.12.055 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx662 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy068 · DOI
  17. 10.1001/jama.2009.1601 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/aje/kwq361 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/aje/kwr026 · DOI
  20. 10.2307/1913827 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1097/00042737-199606000-00017 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1093/aje/152.11.1034 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1093/ije/20.1.209 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.3109/00365529709011208 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1136/gut.30.4.528 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/BF00145375 · DOI
  27. 10.1159/000084525 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1023/A:1024237927985 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.3390/nu9090950 · DOI
  30. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6465 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0168-8278(05)80523-9 · DOI
  32. 10.3181/00379727-157-40043 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0167-4889(89)90203-6 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/0167-4889(86)90202-8 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1210/me.2007-0133 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/jn/135.4.785 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.clinre.2011.08.010 · DOI
  38. Lillemoe KD, 1989, Caffeine prevents cholesterol gallstone formation, Surgery, 106, 400
  39. 10.1186/1475-2891-11-86 · DOI
  40. 10.2337/db10-1193 · DOI
  41. 10.1001/jama.293.3.330 · DOI
  42. 10.3390/nu10101343 · DOI
  43. 10.1002/hep.24046 · DOI
  44. 10.1074/jbc.R400004200 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Nordestgaard, A. T., Stender, S., Nordestgaard, B. G., & Tybjærg‐Hansen, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Clinical Biochemistry Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark
  • Department of Clinical Biochemistry and The Copenhagen General Population Study Herlev and Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen Denmark
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-09-04
Volume
287
Issue
1
Pages
42-53
ISSN
  • 0954-6820
  • 1365-2796
Cited by
21
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.