The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender Ideologies in Europe: A Multidimensional Framework
Open accessAbstract
The authors argue, in line with recent research, that operationalizing gender ideology as a unidimensional construct ranging from traditional to egalitarian is problematic and propose an alternative framework that takes the multidimensionality of gender ideologies into account. Using latent class analysis, they operationalize their gender ideology framework based on data from the 2008 European Values Study, of which eight European countries reflecting the spectrum of current work–family policies were selected. The authors examine the form in which gender ideologies cluster in the various countries. Five ideology profiles were identified: egalitarian, egalitarian essentialism, intensive parenting, moderate traditional, and traditional. The five ideology profiles were found in all countries, but with pronounced variation in size. Ideologies mixing gender essentialist and egalitarian views appear to have replaced traditional ideologies, even in countries offering some institutional support for gendered separate spheres.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Species Richness of Parasite Assemblages: Evolution and Patterns
Poulin, R. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.341 · Cited by 3,499
The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood
Wrigley, J., & Hays, S. (1997) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2655113 · Cited by 2,788
Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes
Lewis, J. (1992) · Journal of European Social Policy · doi:10.1177/095892879200200301 · Cited by 2,305
The Gender Revolution: A Framework for Understanding Changing Family and Demographic Behavior
Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Lappegård, T. (2015) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x · Cited by 1,209
Gender Ideology: Components, Predictors, and Consequences
Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2009) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115920 · Cited by 1,067
Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries
Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/595942 · Cited by 996
Feminist Attitudes and Support for Gender Equality: Opinion Change in Women and Men, 1974-1998
Bolzendahl, C. I., & Myers, D. J. (2004) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.2005.0005 · Cited by 924
Campbell, A. L. (2012) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-012610-135202 · Cited by 860
The End of the Gender Revolution? Gender Role Attitudes from 1977 to 2008
Cotter, D., Hermsen, J. M., & Vanneman, R. (2011) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/658853 · Cited by 661
A Welfare State Paradox: State Interventions and Women’s Employment Opportunities in 22 Countries
Mandel, H., & Semyonov, M. (2006) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/499912 · Cited by 647
Cited by
Gender stereotypes can explain the gender-equality paradox
Breda, T., Jouini, E., Napp, C., & Thebault, G. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2008704117 · Cited by 233
Orian Harel, T., Maoz, I., & Halperin, E. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.11.013 · Cited by 71
The Intersection of Racial and Gender Attitudes, 1977 through 2018
Scarborough, W. J., Pepin, J. R., Lambouths, D. L., Kwon, R., & Monasterio, R. (2021) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224211033582 · Cited by 43
Erdmann, M., Marques Hill, A., Helbig, M., & Leuze, K. (2023) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2023.1175651 · Cited by 12
Tanabe, M., Tun, L., Vaseiezadeh, N., & Dogan, I. (2025) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x251326200 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Grunow, D., Begall, K., & Buchler, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Marriage and Family
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-01-11
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 42-60
- ISSN
- 0022-2445 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3737
- OpenAlex
- W2783777418
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 47.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender Ideologies in Europe: A Multidimensional Framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jomf.12453
- The paper
- Grunow, D., Begall, K., & Buchler, S. (2018). Gender Ideologies in Europe: A Multidimensional Framework. Journal of Marriage and Family. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12453
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
