Cited by 71Social and Intergroup PsychologyPolitical Conflict and GovernanceConflict Management and Negotiation

A conflict within a conflict: intragroup ideological polarization and intergroup intractable conflict

Orian Harel, Tal, Maoz, Ifat, Halperin, Eran·2020·Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.11.013

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intragroup conflicts arise as different Black communities navigate histories of colonialism, migration, and national identity, shaping their approaches to activism, cultural expression, and political engagement.

    “Intragroup conflicts arise as different Black communities navigate histories of colonialism, migration, and national identity, shaping their approaches to activism, cultural expression, and political engagement.”

    From Exploring #Diasporawars on Black Twitter (2025) · cites this paper as Harel et al., 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orian Harel, T., Maoz, I., & Halperin, E.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Halperin, Eran
Venue
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
34
Pages
52-57
ISSN
2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3003691918
Cited by
71
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conflict Management and Negotiation
Keywords
ideological polarization, intractable conflict, intergroup conflict, intragroup conflict, conflict escalation, conflict resolution, reciprocal effects, ideological groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review