Cited by 77Health Sciences Research and EducationNursing education and managementHealth Policy Implementation Science

Nursing unit leaders' influence on the long-term sustainability of evidence-based practice improvements

Open access
Fleiszer, Andrea R., Semenic, Sonia E., Ritchie, Judith A., Richer, Marie-Claire, Denis, Jean-Louis·2016·Journal of Nursing Management

Abstract

AIM: To describe how actions of nursing unit leaders influenced the long-term sustainability of a best practice guidelines (BPG) program on inpatient units. BACKGROUND: Several factors influence the initial implementation of evidence-based practice improvements in nursing, with leadership recognized as essential. However, there is limited knowledge about enduring change, including how frontline nursing leaders influence the sustainability of practice improvements over the long term. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive case study included 39 in-depth interviews, observations, and document reviews. Four embedded nursing unit subcases had differing levels of program sustainability at 7 years (average) following implementation. RESULTS: Higher levels of BPG sustainability occurred on units where formal leadership teams used an integrated set of strategies and activities. Two key strategies were maintaining priorities and reinforcing expectations. The coordinated use of six activities (e.g., discussing, evaluating, integrating) promoted the continuation of BPG practices among staff. These leadership processes, fostering exchange and learning, contributed to sustainability-promoting environments characterized by teamwork and accountability. CONCLUSIONS: Unit leaders are required to strategically orchestrate several overlapping and synergistic efforts to achieve long-term sustainability of BPG-based practice improvements. IMPLICATIONS: As part of managing overall unit performance, unit leaders may influence practice improvement sustainability by aligning vision, strategies, and activities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jonm.12320

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Buchanan D., Fitzgerald L. & Ketley D. (2007) The Sustainabil- ity and Spread of Organizational Change: modernizing Healthcare. Routledge, London, UK.
  2. Ivers N., Jamtvedt G., Flottorp S. et al. (2012) Audit and feed- back: effects on professional practice and healthcare out- comes. Cochrane Database Systematic Review, (6).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fleiszer, A. R., Semenic, S. E., Ritchie, J. A., Richer, M.-C., & Denis, J.-L.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
  • École Nationale d'Administration Publique (CA)
Corresponding author
Fleiszer, Andrea R.
Venue
Journal of Nursing Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06-17
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
309-318
ISSN
0966-0429 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112184996
Cited by
77
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
12.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • McGill University Health Centre Research Institute
  • FERASI Centre
  • Fonds de recherche du Québec - santé
  • McGill University
  • Canadian Nurses Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
evidence-based practice, best practice guidelines, nursing leadership, hospital wards, organizational change, teamwork, accountability
MeSH terms
Canada, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Nurse Administrators, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Nursing, Supervisory, Program Evaluation, Nurse's Role, Qualitative Research, Evidence-Based Nursing, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review