Cited by 395Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealthcare Systems and PracticesPublic Health Policies and Education

Sustainability science: an integrated approach for health-programme planning

Gruen, Russell L, Elliott, Julian H, Nolan, Monica L, Lawton, Paul D, Parkhill, Anne, McLaren, Cameron J, Lavis, John N·2008·The Lancet

Abstract

Planning for programme sustainability is a key contributor to health and development, especially in low-income and middle-income countries. A consensus evidence-based operational framework would facilitate policy and research advances in understanding, measuring, and improving programme sustainability. We did a systematic review of both conceptual frameworks and empirical studies about health-programme sustainability. On the basis of the review, we propose that sustainable health programmes are regarded as complex systems that encompass programmes, health problems targeted by programmes, and programmes' drivers or key stakeholders, all of which interact dynamically within any given context. We show the usefulness of this approach with case studies drawn from the authors' experience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61659-1

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gruen, R. L., Elliott, J. H., Nolan, M. L., Lawton, P. D., Parkhill, A., McLaren, C. J., & Lavis, J. N.
Affiliations
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
  • Burnet Institute (AU)
  • Northern Territory Health Services (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Gruen, Russell L
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
372
Issue
9649
Pages
1579-1589
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2107568324
Cited by
395
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 15
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
program planning, complex systems, stakeholder interaction, low- and middle-income countries, health and development, operational framework, sustainability measurement
MeSH terms
Developing Countries, Health Planning, Health Promotion, Humans, Primary Health Care, Public Health, Total Quality Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review