Cited by 161Health Policy Implementation SciencePublic Health Policies and EducationCommunity Health and Development

Linking Sustainability Research to Intervention Types

Open access
Scheirer, Mary Ann·2013·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Researchers, funders, and managers of health programs and interventions have become concerned about their long-term sustainability. However, most research about sustainability has not considered the nature of the program to be sustained. Health-related interventions may differ in their likelihood of sustainability and in the factors likely to influence continuation. I suggest a framework for analyzing the sustainability of 6 types of interventions: (1) those implemented by individual providers; (2) programs requiring coordination among multiple staff; (3) new policies, procedures, or technologies; (4) capacity or infrastructure building; (5) community partnerships or collaborations; and (6) broad-scale system change. Hypotheses for future research and strategies that program managers might use to achieve sustainability also differ by program or intervention type.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2012.300976

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No agreed-upon definition exists for the term healthcare program sustainability.

    “To make matters worse, no agreed-upon definition exists for the term healthcare program sustainability [106].”
  • Scheirer et al. posit an intervention typology based on who and what is required for continued implementation, hypothesizing what factors are most salient for sustainment success of each type.

    “Scheirer et al. [54] posit an intervention typology based on who and what is required for continued implementation—which hypothesizes what factors are most salient for sustainment success of each type.”
  • Intervention targets have been categorized as: change behavior of individuals; change coordinated behaviors among multiple staff; change policies, procedures, and technologies; increase organizational or system-level capacity or improve infrastructure; create or strengthen collaborative partnerships or coalitions; and change systems.

    “Intervention targets have been categorized as: change behavior of individuals; change coordinated behaviors among multiple staff; change policies, procedures, and technologies; increase organizational or system-level capacity or improve infrastructure; create or strengthen collaborative partnerships or coalitions; and change systems [32].”
  • Scheirer proposed that one size does not fit all with interventions, and that sustainability research and planning might differ based on intervention structure.

    “Scheirer (117) proposed that one size does not fit all with interventions, and that sustainability research and planning might differ based on intervention structure (e.g., what the interventions are and how they are implemented).”
  • Scheirer proposed six types of interventions or programs distinguished by their structure: individual providers; coordination among multiple staff; new policies/procedures/technologies; capacity/infrastructure building; collaborative partnerships/coalitions; and broad-scale system change.

    “Scheirer proposed six types of interventions or programs distinguished by their structure, namely (a) interventions implemented by individual providers; (b) interventions requiring coordination among multiple staff; (c) new policies, procedures, and technologies; (d) capacity or infrastructure building; (e) collaborative partnerships or coalitions; and (f) broad-scale system change.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]National Institutes of Health. 5th Annual NIH Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation Research. Available at: http://conferences.thehillgroup.com/obssr.DI2012/about.html. Accessed January 10, 2012.
  2. [7]Williams B, Imam I, eds. Systems Concepts in Evaluation: An Expert Anthology. Point Reyes, CA: Edge Press of Inverness; 2007 [Google Scholar]
  3. [32]Goodman PS, Associates. Change in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 1982 [Google Scholar]
  4. [43]Boucar M, Franco LM, Sabou D, Saley Z, Jennings L, Mohan D. Sustaining Better Maternal and Newborn Care and Quality Improvement in Niger: Challenges and Successes. Bethesda, MD: USAID Health Care Improvement Project and University Research Co; 2011 [Google Scholar]
  5. [45]Frazier CM, Williams K-A. Using Evaluation to Understand Infrastructure Development in State Oral Health Programs. Paper presented at: annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association; November 4, 2011; Anaheim, CA [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scheirer, M. A.
Affiliations
Mary Ann Scheirer is with Scheirer Consulting, Princeton, NJ.
Corresponding author
Scheirer, Mary Ann
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2013-04
Volume
103
Issue
4
Pages
e73-e80
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2152056361
Cited by
161
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5
FWCI
28.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
Keywords
intervention sustainability, intervention types, capacity building, community partnerships, system change, research framework
MeSH terms
Community Health Services, Community-Institutional Relations, Community Participation, Cooperative Behavior, Health Plan Implementation, Health Planning, Health Planning Guidelines, Health Policy, Health Services Research, Humans, Organizational Innovation, Program Evaluation, Public Health Practice, Program Development, Evidence-Based Practice, Capacity Building

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review