Cited by 130Obesity and Health PracticesBullying, Victimization, and AggressionObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Relationship of Weight-Based Teasing and Adolescents’ Psychological Well-Being and Physical Health

Greenleaf, Christy, Petrie, Trent A., Martin, Scott B.·2014·Journal of School Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To date, research has focused primarily on psychological correlates of weight-based teasing. In this study, we extended previous work by also examining physical health-related variables (eg, physical self-concept and physical fitness [PF]). METHODS: Participants included 1419 middle school students (637 boys and 782 girls). Of these, 245 (17.3%) reported being teased about being overweight. Participants completed measures of self-esteem, depression, physical self-concept, physical activity (PA) self-efficacy, and self-report physical and sedentary activities. Participants also completed PF testing. RESULTS: After controlling for demographic characteristics, participants who were teased about being overweight had higher scores on depression and lower scores on self-esteem, physical self-concept, PA self-efficacy, and health-related measures of PF in comparison to participants who were not teased. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support previous research indicating relationships between teasing and low levels of psychological well-being, physical self-concept, and PA self-efficacy, and establishes one between weight-based teasing and different types of PF. Research is needed to determine the potential causal nature of the relationships between teasing and fitness and evidence-based interventions are needed to reduce weight-based teasing and its potential effects on health and well-being.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/josh.12118

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greenleaf, C., Petrie, T. A., & Martin, S. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
  • University of North Texas (US)
Corresponding author
Greenleaf, Christy
Venue
Journal of School Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12-10
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
49-55
ISSN
  • 0022-4391 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-1561
OpenAlex
W2064877412
Cited by
130
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of School Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Association for Sport and Physical Education
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
weight-based teasing, weight stigma, adolescents, psychological well-being, self-esteem, depression, physical self-concept, physical fitness, exercise self-efficacy, sedentary behavior, junior high school students, overweight
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Depression, Female, Health Education, Health Status, Humans, Male, Obesity, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Self Concept, Psychological Distance, Students, United States, Comorbidity, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review