Cited by 670Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesVocational and Entrepreneurial EducationHigher Education and Employability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Competency-Based Perspective on Entrepreneurship Education: Conceptual and Empirical Insights

Morris, Michael H., Webb, Justin W., Fu, Jun, Singhal, Sujata·2013·Journal of Small Business Management

Abstract

Competencies necessary for entrepreneurial action are investigated. Building on structuration theory, competencies are approached as an outgrowth of the learning of scripts deriving from interactions between the individual and environment. Managerial and entrepreneurial competencies are distinguished, with the latter helping to define the domain of entrepreneurship education. Employing a Delphi methodology, evidence is provided of a core set of 13 entrepreneurial competencies. Measures are then developed with a pilot study involving students in an international education program. Based on pre- and post-measures, findings demonstrate significant improvement on the competencies. Implications are drawn for the role of entrepreneurship education in competency development.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsbm.12023

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 97 references

1 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bird, 1995, Advances in Entrepreneurship Firm Emergence & Growth, 52
  2. Klarus, 1999, Beoordelen: Met Competentieprofielen of Kwalificatiestructuren: Onderwijs en Bedrijfsleven Staan Weliswaar nog ver van Elkaar af in de Wijze Waarop zij Beoordelen, Maar Groeien Meer en Meer naar Elkaar toe in Denken over en Kiezen van de Wijze van Beoordeling van Medewerkers, Opleiding and Ontwikkeling, 12, 15
  3. Luken, 2004, Are Competences Measurable? Dilemma and Escape in Operationalizing the Competence Concept, Tijdschrift Voor Hoger Onderwijs, 22, 38
  4. Nunnally, 1978, Psychometric Theory
  5. Orser, 2003, Management Competencies and SME Performance Criteria: A Pilot Study
  6. Smith, 2005, Entrepreneurial Competencies: Literature Review and Best Practices

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 659

Metadata

Authors
Morris, M. H., Webb, J. W., Fu, J., & Singhal, S.
Affiliations
Oklahoma State University (US)
Corresponding author
Morris, Michael H.
Venue
Journal of Small Business Management
Published
2013-06-13
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
352-369
ISSN
0047-2778 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025701562
Cited by
670
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 1
FWCI
44.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Small Business Management (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Vocational and Entrepreneurial Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
Keywords
entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurial skills, managerial competencies, structuration theory, scripts, competence development, competency measurement, international education programs, learning outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review