Cited by 19Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Refinement of the cutoff values of the HemosIL AcuStar assay for the detection of anticardiolipin and anti‐beta2 glycoprotein‐1 antibodies

Open access
Fontana, P., Poncet, A., Lindhoff‐Last, E., de Moerloose, P., Devreese, K.M.·2014·Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Abstract

Background The HemosIL AcuStar antiphospholipid assay (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA, USA) is a fully automated assay using chemiluminescent technology for the detection of anticardiolipin and anti-beta2 glycoprotein-1 antibodies. This assay showed excellent agreement between results of different laboratories. The cutoff values to define positivity were calculated in 250 healthy blood bank donors but were associated with large confidence intervals (CIs).Objective The objective of this study was to more precisely determine the cutoff values of the HemosIL AcuStar antiphospholipid assay by increasing the number of healthy blood bank donors through a multicenter study and by applying a normalization procedure of the distribution of each antibody.Methods Five laboratories participated to this study, allowing the inclusion of 626 samples. We used a Box-Cox power transformation method to normalize the distribution and calculate the 99th percentile and the corresponding 95%CI for each antibody.Results The revised cutoff values were overall lower than those initially calculated with more stringent CIs and yielded a 4.2% increase in sensitivity with a 2.7% decrease in specificity regarding thrombotic events or obstetric complications.Conclusions We provide refined cutoff values for the detection of anticardiolipin and anti-beta2 glycoprotein-1 antibodies with the HemosIL AcuStar Antiphospholipid assay that should be preferred for routine use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jth.12732

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Devreese KM, Pierangeli SS, de Laat B, Tripodi A, Atsumi T, Ortel TL. Testing for Antiphospholipid antibodies with Solid Phase Assays: recommendations from the Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Phospholipid-Dependent Antibodies. J Thromb Haemost 2014; 36: 352-63.
  2. Tincani A, Allegri F, Balestrieri G, Reber G, Sanmarco M, Me- roni P, Boffa MC. Minimal requirements for antiphospholipid ACL-lgG 200 200 200 200 300 300 400 500 250 150 150 150 150
  3. Frequency Frequency Frequency antibodies ELISAs proposed by the European Forum on anti- phospholipid antibodies. Thromb Res 2004; 114: 553-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fontana, P., Poncet, A., Lindhoff‐Last, E., de Moerloose, P., & Devreese, K. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • University Hospital Frankfurt (DE)
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
Corresponding author
Fontana, P.
Venue
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
2034-2037
ISSN
1538-7836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987991996
Cited by
19
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
antiphospholipid antibodies, anticardiolipin antibodies, cut-off values, chemiluminescence immunoassay, healthy blood donors, assay sensitivity and specificity, thrombotic complications, pregnancy complications
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Antibodies, Automation, Blood Donors, Cardiolipins, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Sensitivity and Specificity, Thrombosis, Reproducibility of Results, Proportional Hazards Models, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Antibodies, Anticardiolipin, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Luminescence, beta 2-Glycoprotein I, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review