Cited by 134Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchVasculitis and related conditionsBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

Influence of different IgG anticardiolipin antibody cut‐off values on antiphospholipid syndrome classification

Open access
RUFFATTI, A., OLIVIERI, S., TONELLO, M., BORTOLATI, M., BISON, E., SALVAN, E., FACCHINETTI, M., PENGO, V.·2008·Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Abstract

Background While medium to high titers of anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies, defined as >40 GPL units or >99th percentile, is a laboratory criteria for the 'definite' diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), agreement between the two cut-offs has not been validated.Objective To validate the current aCL laboratory criterion by verifying the effect of the two cut-offs on APS classification.Patients/methods Ninety aCL positive APS patients were selected on the basis of their GPL values above the 99th percentile (17.4 GPL), which was calculated by testing 100 age- and sex-matched healthy subjects.Results A significant difference in the IgG positivity (P < 0.0001) was found between the APS laboratory profiles as 20 out of the 24 (83.3%) patients with single positivity (aCL alone), six out of the 23 (26.1%) with double positivity (aCL plus lupus anticoagulant or anti-beta(2)glycoprotein I), and none out of the 43 with triple positivity (aCL plus lupus anticoagulant and anti-beta(2)glycoprotein I) had titers between the 99th percentile and 40 GPL units. Moreover, the rate of aCL values between the 99th percentile and 40 GPL units was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in patients with pregnancy morbidity (73.7%) as compared to those with vascular thrombosis (16.9%) and those with both conditions (16.7%).Conclusion The 99th percentile cut-off level seems more sensitive than the >40 GPL value for APS classification, as it includes subjects with aCL positivity alone as well as patients with pregnancy morbidity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03121.x

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors' earlier work found that 40 GPL units, rather than the 99th percentile, is a valid cut-off for identifying thrombosis risk.

    “We also recently observed that 40 units GPL rather than the 99th percentile is a valid cut-off to identify patients at risk of thrombosis [24].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
RUFFATTI, A., OLIVIERI, S., TONELLO, M., BORTOLATI, M., BISON, E., SALVAN, E., FACCHINETTI, M., & PENGO, V.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
RUFFATTI, A.
Venue
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
6
Issue
10
Pages
1693-1696
ISSN
1538-7836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977057127
Cited by
134
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 16
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Keywords
antiphospholipid syndrome, anticardiolipin antibodies, IgG, cut-off values, 99th percentile, anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, pregnancy morbidity, thrombosis, diagnostic sensitivity
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Male, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Sensitivity and Specificity, Thrombosis, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Antibodies, Anticardiolipin, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, beta 2-Glycoprotein I

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review