Cited by 76Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsVasculitis and related conditions

Standardization of antiphospholipid antibody assays. Where do we stand?

Devreese, KMJ·2012·Lupus

Abstract

The laboratory criteria (lupus anticoagulants (LA), and/or anti-cardiolipin (aCL) antibodies and/or anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI)) that define patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) were set in the Sapporo and Sydney criteria published in 1999 and 2006, respectively, and led to a substantial improvement in the recognition of APS. In addition, guidelines for LA detection were published by the Scientific Standardisation Subcommittee (SSC) of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) in 2009. However, a number of questions on this respect remain unresolved. Recommendations for the aCL and aβ2GPI assays intended to ameliorate the performance of these solid-phase assays. Despite efforts over the years, standardization has not been reached. This review will focus on methodological issues of the three antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) subtypes that are the subject of debate. The use of an international standard for aPL detection might help solve many of the problems caused by a lack of standardization of these assays.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0961203312439335

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Devreese, K.
Affiliations
Coagulation Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
Venue
Lupus
Published
2012-05-25
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
718-721
ISSN
  • 0961-2033 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0962
OpenAlex
W2123051496
Cited by
76
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lupus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
Keywords
antiphospholipid syndrome, antiphospholipid antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies, assay standardization, international standards, solid-phase immunoassay
MeSH terms
Blood Coagulation Tests, Humans, Reference Standards, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Antibodies, Antiphospholipid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review