Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hi‐LAB: A New Measure of Aptitude for High‐Level Language Proficiency

Linck, Jared A., Hughes, Meredith M., Campbell, Susan G., Silbert, Noah H., Tare, Medha, Jackson, Scott R., Smith, Benjamin K., Bunting, Michael F., Doughty, Catherine J.·2013·Language Learning
DOI 10.1111/lang.12011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Few adult second language (L2) learners successfully attain high‐level proficiency. Although decades of research on beginning to intermediate stages of L2 learning have identified a number of predictors of the rate of acquisition, little research has examined factors relevant to predicting very high levels of L2 proficiency. The current study, conducted in the United States, was designed to examine potential cognitive predictors of successful learning to advanced proficiency levels. Participants were adults with varying degrees of success in L2 learning, including a critical group with high proficiency as indicated by standardized language proficiency tests and on‐the‐job language use. Results from a series of group discrimination analyses indicate that high‐level attainment was related to working memory (including phonological short‐term memory and task set switching), associative learning, and implicit learning. We consider the implications for the construct of high‐level language aptitude and identify future directions for aptitude research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/lang.12011

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., Silbert, N. H., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., Smith, B. K., Bunting, M. F., & Doughty, C. J.
Venue
Language Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-06-04
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
530-566
ISSN
  • 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9922
DOI
10.1111/lang.12011
OpenAlex
W1773717338
Cited by
253
References
11
FWCI
107.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hi‐LAB: A New Measure of Aptitude for High‐Level Language Proficiency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/lang.12011
The paper
Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., Silbert, N. H., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., Smith, B. K., Bunting, M. F., & Doughty, C. J. (2013). Hi‐LAB: A New Measure of Aptitude for High‐Level Language Proficiency. Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.