The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hi‐LAB: A New Measure of Aptitude for High‐Level Language Proficiency
Abstract
Few adult second language (L2) learners successfully attain high‐level proficiency. Although decades of research on beginning to intermediate stages of L2 learning have identified a number of predictors of the rate of acquisition, little research has examined factors relevant to predicting very high levels of L2 proficiency. The current study, conducted in the United States, was designed to examine potential cognitive predictors of successful learning to advanced proficiency levels. Participants were adults with varying degrees of success in L2 learning, including a critical group with high proficiency as indicated by standardized language proficiency tests and on‐the‐job language use. Results from a series of group discrimination analyses indicate that high‐level attainment was related to working memory (including phonological short‐term memory and task set switching), associative learning, and implicit learning. We consider the implications for the construct of high‐level language aptitude and identify future directions for aptitude research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the tests of executive working memory did not distinguish between the groups, nor did processing speed or the auditory tests.”
From Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (2017) · cites this paper as Linck et al. 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 · Cited by 15,798
mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R
Buuren, S. V., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v045.i03 · Cited by 13,870
Statistical Analysis with Missing Data
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119013563 · Cited by 8,473
An automated version of the operation span task
Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03192720 · Cited by 1,861
Maturational constraints on language learning
Newport, E. L. (1990) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1401_2 · Cited by 1,738
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00507.x · Cited by 815
Individual Differences in Second Language Learning
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003) · The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch18 · Cited by 563
The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226310808073x · Cited by 446
Cited by
The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy: A Meta‐Analysis
Kang, E., & Han, Z. (2015) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12189 · Cited by 385
Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow
Wen, Z. (., Biedroń, A., & Skehan, P. (2017) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444816000276 · Cited by 248
Comparing Elicited Imitation and Word Monitoring as Measures of Implicit Knowledge
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2015) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12138 · Cited by 139
Child first language and adult second language are both tied to general-purpose learning systems
Hamrick, P., Lum, J. A. G., & Ullman, M. T. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1713975115 · Cited by 120
Instructed second language acquisition (ISLA)
Long, M. M. (2017) · Instructed Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1558/isla.33314 · Cited by 108
INCIDENTAL VOCABULARY LEARNING IN SLA: EFFECTS OF FREQUENCY, AURAL ENHANCEMENT, AND WORKING MEMORY
Malone, J. (2018) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263117000341 · Cited by 100
Hamrick, P. (2015) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.10.003 · Cited by 89
New conceptualizations of linguistic giftedness.
Biedroń, A., & Pawlak, M. (2016) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444815000439 · Cited by 70
Examining the LLAMA aptitude tests
Rogers, V., Meara, P., Barnett-Legh, T., Curry, C., & Davie, E. (2017) · Journal of the European Second Language Association · doi:10.22599/jesla.24 · Cited by 57
THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF IMPLICIT-STATISTICAL LEARNING APTITUDE TO IMPLICIT SECOND-LANGUAGE KNOWLEDGE
Godfroid, A., & Kim, K. M. (2021) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263121000085 · Cited by 51
LANGUAGE APTITUDE AND GRAMMATICAL DIFFICULTY: An EFL Classroom-Based Study
Yalçın, Ş., & Spada, N. (2016) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263115000509 · Cited by 47
Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes
Skehan, P. (2016) · Bilingual Processing and Acquisition · doi:10.1075/bpa.3.02ske · Cited by 44
GRANENA, G. (2016) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716415000120 · Cited by 40
Li, S., & DeKeyser, R. (2021) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263121000024 · Cited by 35
Granena, G. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781108625616 · Cited by 27
Saito, K. (2023) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444822000453 · Cited by 26
Sparks, R. L., & Dale, P. S. (2023) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263123000037 · Cited by 20
Li, P., & Grant, A. (2015) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.07.013 · Cited by 20
Scrutinizing LLAMA D as a measure of implicit learning aptitude
Iizuka, T., & DeKeyser, R. (2024) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263122000559 · Cited by 16
Sixty years of second language aptitude research: A systematic quantitative literature review
Chalmers, J., Eisenchlas, S. A., Munro, A., & Schalley, A. C. (2021) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12440 · Cited by 12
EXPLORING SYNTACTIC PRIMING AS A MEASURE OF IMPLICIT LANGUAGE APTITUDE
Li, S., & Qian, J. (2021) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263120000698 · Cited by 11
Aptitude for Explicit and Implicit Learning
Pavlekovic, R., & Roehr-Brackin, K. (2024) · Journal of the European Second Language Association · doi:10.22599/jesla.117 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., Silbert, N. H., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., Smith, B. K., Bunting, M. F., & Doughty, C. J.
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-06-04
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 530-566
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W1773717338
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 107.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.