Cited by 53

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Early ALT response to corticosteroid treatment distinguishes idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury from autoimmune hepatitis

Weber, Sabine, Benesic, Andreas, Rotter, Isabelle, Gerbes, Alexander L.·2019·Liver International

Abstract

Background: Drug‐induced liver injury (DILI) and idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) are competing diagnoses in patients with acute liver injury (ALI) and drug intake. In absence of unequivocal markers, scores like RUCAM and AIH are used to distinguish both entities. However, in some cases the diagnosis remains ambiguous. Our aim was to identify a simple parameter to discriminate DILI and AIH shortly after starting corticosteroid treatment. Methods: For the current analysis, 44 patients with ALI who took at least one drug and who received corticosteroids were included and comprised 22 DILI and 22 AIH cases. Scores of AIH and RUCAM were calculated at initial presentation, the final diagnosis was made from analysing the course of disease. Changes in the serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentrations after starting corticosteroid treatment were determined and compared between the DILI and AIH groups. Results: Fifty‐nine per cent of patients (n = 26) were correctly classified at presentation by AIH score and RUCAM respectively. However, in one‐third (n = 13) of the 44 patients, results were inconclusive and five other patients were misclassified. The decrease in ALT levels 1 week after the initiation of steroid therapy was significantly more pronounced in patients with the final diagnosis of DILI than in AIH patients (accuracy 77%). This difference was also observed in the 18 initially misclassified or inconclusive cases (accuracy 83%). Conclusion: Short‐term response of ALT to corticosteroid therapy helps to differentiate DILI and AIH. This finding may be helpful in treatment decision for patients with inconclusive diagnostic scores.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/liv.14195

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.02.050 · DOI
  2. 10.7326/0003-4819-137-12-200212170-00007 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01818.x · DOI
  4. 10.1002/lt.20204 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1053/jhep.2002.34857 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s10620-011-1611-4 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1111/liv.12988 · DOI
  8. 10.1055/s-0034-1375959 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.043 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1002/hep.23588 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1002/hep.26709 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/1756283X12450251 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/hep.24481 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/hep.26290 · DOI
  15. 10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8608895 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.05.027 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1002/hep.23584 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.5009/gnl15352 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.dld.2014.08.040 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.09.009 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.10.007 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.049 · DOI
  23. 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309528 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/clpt.2011.58 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/hep.20800 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1002/hep.20703 · DOI
  27. 10.1353/pbm.1968.0004 · DOI
  28. 10.3390/ijms17010014 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/S0168-8278(99)80297-9 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1002/hep.22322 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.5223/pghn.2018.21.4.347 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.006 · DOI
  33. 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1053/gast.1997.v112.pm9178696 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/hep.1840130415 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/ng.379 · DOI
  37. 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.016 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.05.013 · DOI
  39. 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.001 · DOI
  40. 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000230 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1159/000480139 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/ajg.2017.215 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Weber, S., Benesic, A., Rotter, I., & Gerbes, A. L.
Affiliations
Department of Medicine II, Liver Centre Munich University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany
Venue
Liver International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-08-05
Volume
39
Issue
10
Pages
1906-1917
ISSN
  • 1478-3223
  • 1478-3231
Cited by
53
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review