Cited by 188Subtitles and Audiovisual MediaSecond Language Acquisition and LearningVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Enhancing Vocabulary Learning Through Captioned Video: An Eye‐Tracking Study

MONTERO PEREZ, MARIBEL, PETERS, ELKE, DESMET, PIET·2015·The Modern Language Journal

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of two attention‐enhancing techniques on L2 students' learning and processing of novel French words (i.e., target words) through video with L2 subtitles or captions. A combination of eye‐movement data and vocabulary tests was gathered to study the effects of Type of Captioning (full or keyword captioning) and Test Announcement, realized by informing (intentional) or not informing (incidental) learners about upcoming vocabulary tests. The study adopted a between‐subjects design with two independent variables (Type of Captioning and Test Announcement) resulting in four experimental groups: full captioning, incidental; full captioning, intentional; keyword captioning, incidental; keyword captioning, intentional. Results indicated that learners in the keyword groups outperformed the other groups on the form recognition test. Analyses of learners' total fixation and second pass time on the target words revealed a significant interaction effect between Type of Captioning and Test Announcement. Results also suggest that second pass as well as total fixation duration and word learning positively correlated for learners in the full captioning, intentional group: The longer their fixations on a given word, the more likely correct recognition became. Results are discussed in relation to attention and word learning through video.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/modl.12215

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On-screen text in the absence of attention-enhancing techniques may not help learners process the bimodal channel of audio input and visual pictures.

    “On-screen text -in the absence of attention-enhancing techniques -may not help learners process the bimodal channel of audio input and visual pictures (Montero Perez, Peters, & Desmet, 2015).”

    From Vocabulary learning through videos: captions, advance-organizer strategy, and their combination (2022) · cites this paper as Montero Perez, Peters, & Desmet, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MONTERO PEREZ, M., PETERS, E., & DESMET, P.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) Department of Linguistics Etienne Sabbelaan 53 B‐8500 Kortrijk Belgium
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • iMinds (BE)
Venue
The Modern Language Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06
Volume
99
Issue
2
Pages
308-328
ISSN
  • 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4781
OpenAlex
W1604084538
Cited by
188
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5
FWCI
44.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Funders
iMinds
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
vocabulary acquisition, captioned video, French as a second language, incidental learning, intentional learning, eye movements, fixation duration, word recognition, attention, second language acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review