Cited by 318EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Learning and TeachingMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

The Motivational Foundation of Learning Languages Other Than Global English: Theoretical Issues and Research Directions

DÖRNYEI, ZOLTÁN, AL‐HOORIE, ALI H.·2017·The Modern Language Journal

Abstract

The theoretical paradigms of second language (L2) learning motivation developed over the past 25 years have been largely based on the study of English as a target language, which raises the question as to whether they are equally applicable to the understanding of the motivation to learn languages other than English (LOTEs). It is suggested in this article that current conceptualizations of L2 motivation display certain subtle characteristics that may not do full justice to the understanding of the motivation underlying LOTEs, either by downplaying certain important features or by providing an insufficiently nuanced representation of areas where the motivation to learn English and LOTEs diverges. The discussion addresses five such aspects: (a) the confounding interaction of English‐ and LOTE‐related self‐images, (b) the individualistic focus of the ideal L2 self, (c) the different nature/role of the ought‐to self associated with languages with substantial versus marginal social support, (d) the different nature of goals in the learning of English and LOTEs, and (e) the differing role of unconscious motives in the study of English and LOTEs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/modl.12408

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A very small number of studies investigated a language other than English (k = 3).

    “Finally, a very small number of studies investigated a language other than English (k = 3), supporting Dörnyei and Al-Hoorie's (2017) argument that the language motivation field is currently English-biased.”

    From The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Dörnyei and Al-Hoorie, 2017

  • English's global status may make the motivation to learn it distinct from the motivation to learn other languages.

    “However, its global status may make the motivation to learn it distinct from the motivation to learn other languages (Dörnyei & Al-Hoorie, 2017).”

    From The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Dörnyei & Al-Hoorie, 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DÖRNYEI, Z., & AL‐HOORIE, A. H.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
  • DÖRNYEI, ZOLTÁN
  • AL‐HOORIE, ALI H.
Venue
The Modern Language Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08-25
Volume
101
Issue
3
Pages
455-468
ISSN
  • 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4781
OpenAlex
W2751247354
Cited by
318
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
141.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
second language motivation, non-English languages, ideal self, ought self, self-image, learning objectives, unconscious motivation, individualism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review