The Motivational Foundation of Learning Languages Other Than Global English: Theoretical Issues and Research Directions
Abstract
The theoretical paradigms of second language (L2) learning motivation developed over the past 25 years have been largely based on the study of English as a target language, which raises the question as to whether they are equally applicable to the understanding of the motivation to learn languages other than English (LOTEs). It is suggested in this article that current conceptualizations of L2 motivation display certain subtle characteristics that may not do full justice to the understanding of the motivation underlying LOTEs, either by downplaying certain important features or by providing an insufficiently nuanced representation of areas where the motivation to learn English and LOTEs diverges. The discussion addresses five such aspects: (a) the confounding interaction of English‐ and LOTE‐related self‐images, (b) the individualistic focus of the ideal L2 self, (c) the different nature/role of the ought‐to self associated with languages with substantial versus marginal social support, (d) the different nature of goals in the learning of English and LOTEs, and (e) the differing role of unconscious motives in the study of English and LOTEs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A very small number of studies investigated a language other than English (k = 3).
“Finally, a very small number of studies investigated a language other than English (k = 3), supporting Dörnyei and Al-Hoorie's (2017) argument that the language motivation field is currently English-biased.”
From The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Dörnyei and Al-Hoorie, 2017
English's global status may make the motivation to learn it distinct from the motivation to learn other languages.
“However, its global status may make the motivation to learn it distinct from the motivation to learn other languages (Dörnyei & Al-Hoorie, 2017).”
From The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Dörnyei & Al-Hoorie, 2017
Cites
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.9.954 · Cited by 5,806 · see citing works
Ferguson, C. A. (1959) · <i>WORD</i> · doi:10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702 · Cited by 3,206 · see citing works
2. The L2 Motivational Self System
Dörnyei, Z. (2009) · Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self · doi:10.21832/9781847691293-003 · Cited by 2,052 · cited 11× · see citing works
“…fact that it was seen by many to be linked to the learners’ attitudes toward the target language community, whereas such a direct link could not be maintained with regard to Global English associated with “a nonspecific global community of English language users” (Ushioda & Dörnyei, 2009, p. 3).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationMere Exposure: A Gateway to the Subliminal
Zajonc, R. B. (2001) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00154 · Cited by 1,299 · see citing works
L2 motivation research 2005–2014: Understanding a publication surge and a changing landscape
Boo, Z., Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.10.006 · Cited by 589 · see citing works
Self-citationImplicit social cognition: from measures to mechanisms
Nosek, B. A., Hawkins, C. B., & Frazier, R. S. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.005 · Cited by 578 · see citing works
Motivation, Language Attitudes and Globalisation: A Hungarian Perspective
Dörnyei, Z., Csizér, K., & Németh, N. (2006) · doi:10.21832/9781853598876 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Engagement in language learning: a systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2024) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688211001289 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
“Among these, what stands out is the dominance of L2 English, accounting for just over 70% in the pool.”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis
Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2018) · Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.4.2 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Self-citationDewaele, J.-M., & Proietti Ergün, A. L. (2020) · Journal of the European Second Language Association · doi:10.22599/jesla.65 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
- Authors
- DÖRNYEI, Z., & AL‐HOORIE, A. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- DÖRNYEI, ZOLTÁN
- AL‐HOORIE, ALI H.
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-08-25
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 455-468
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4781
- OpenAlex
- W2751247354
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 141.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Keywords
- second language motivation, non-English languages, ideal self, ought self, self-image, learning objectives, unconscious motivation, individualism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review