Cited by 3,206Language, Linguistics, Cultural AnalysisLexicography and Language StudiesLinguistics and Language Studies

Diglossia.

Open access
Ferguson, Charles A.·1959·WORD

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferguson, C. A.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Ferguson, Charles A.
Venue
WORD
Published
1959-01
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
325-340
ISSN
  • 0043-7956 (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-5112
OpenAlex
W4240298715
Cited by
3,206
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 233 · 2025: 274 · 2024: 172 · 2023: 137 · 2022: 208 · 2021: 151 · 2020: 223 · 2019: 222 · 2018: 96 · 2017: 119 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 127 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 94
FWCI
14.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
WORD (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Lexicography and Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Studies
Keywords
diglossia, language contact, language varieties, bilingualism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review